Friday, August 8, 2003

Wairarapa Police Pervert the Course of Justice While Ignoring Child Abuse

The letter above waffles on making excuses for Constable Cunningham's harassment of me regarding the "Billsticking" charge. The Police charged me with putting up notices to advertise a public meeting to discuss the illegal takeover mismanagement and closure of the Carterton Community Centre. These notices said "You are invited to a public meeting to discuss the mismanagement and illegal takeover of the Carterton Community Centre" and the date and time of the meeting. Hardly a criminal act warranting the intervention of the police - not for billsticking that's for sure - investigation of the fraud and mismanagement by all means. The allegation that these notices might in any way constitute "harassment" is ridiculous - and corrupt!

Then, on page 2, the letter admits that the trespass notice used to prevent me from attending meetings of the Carterton Community Centre since 2001 was never legal.


The letter above refers firstly to some of the letters written by lawyer Ken Daniels to the police, and Sgt Murray Johnston's rude and arrogant email dismissal of our complaints. The complaints have been corruptly ignored in spite of monumental evidence of fraud and gross misfeasance.

Secondly, the letter contains the refusal of the police to charge local prostitute Rachel Betteridge with Perjury, or anything else, after Betteridge and her husband sent me text messages, saying "You need a bullet" and "Watch your back" among other extremely offensive and threatening messages. Police have been provided with signed statements from two Justices of the Peace, and a considerable amount of other information, in support of my complaints regarding this lying prostitute.

Thirdly, the letter refers to the nasty drunken home invasion and assault committed by corruptly 'elected' Mayor Gary McPhee, and the refusal of the police to charge him or his co-offender. "The matter was investigated at the time and no charges were to be laid." - Oh really? WHY NOT? - This sounds like another excuse used by the police to let criminals off: "I am aware that the Carterton District Council Members, the Carterton Mayor and MP Georgina Beyer have recently discussed issues around the closing of the centre. In such circumstances the actions of the 'elected' officers of the centre are most unlikely to have breached any Criminal Law."

Fourthly, the letter refers to the Bill Sticking charges laid against me by Constable Cunningham in about 2003, and the fact that the prosecution was so zealously pursued although there was absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support the police wasting their time on it right from the beginning.

Let's have a look at how the police have been wasting their time and our money trying to pervert the course of justice in order to prolong the corrupt reign of Gary McPhee and the others on the Carterton District Council who are guilty of conspiring to pervert the course of justice.

Let's compare the evidence in all of the prosecutions brought against me - nearly all of which have been unsuccessful and the rest of which do not stand up to scrutiny - with the evidence in support of all the complaints made by me, and supported by letters from several lawyers and community petitions, etc, all of which the police have refused to acknowledge or accept.

I came to Carterton in 2001 and have been the subject of a campaign of corrupt, politically motivated bullying by the local police and their associates, beginning with the refusal of the police to prosecute anyone for the assault and illegal takeover, malfeasance, etc at the Carterton Community Centre in 2001, the laying of the Bill Sticking charges in 2003, and have continued to the present day and the lies told to the South End School and St Matthews Collegiate, and the current corruptly laid charges of perverting the course of justice and escaping from custody, based on the word of one of the biggest criminals in Carterton! Good luck trying to convict me on this orchestrated litany of lies! Masterton Police prosecution staff won't touch it, the prosecutor has crossed his own name off the summons and substituted it with that of Constable Peter Cletoris Cunningham, who never made it past the rank of Constable for obvious reasons! - like his mates Constables Pope and Wakefield.  Constable Cunningham was deliberately dishonest - so was Alison Mulholland, the Masterton Court forensic 'nurse' who directed the psychiatrist speak with corrupt Constable Cunningham, who told Dr Barry-Walsh an orchestrated litany of lies: "Peter Cunningham indicated he has known Ms Raue in his role with the New Zealand Police in Carterton for seven years.  He described a similar pattern to that observed by Mr Daniels.  He noted that Ms Raue develops friendships with people, which goes smoothly for a time, but eventually ends in conflict or breakup.   He speculated this may be when she is confronted with something she does not wish to hear or is otherwise contradicted.  He stated Ms Raue tends to respond by making allegations and complaints to the police and engaging in angry and sometimes offensive behaviour, such as making phone calls.  He noted that she will then quieten down, sometimes for months at a time, before returning to make more complaints.  Mr Cunningham observed that he finds that when she makes these complaints, she often speaks in a rapid, driven manner, with disorganised thoughts that appear "all over the place".  He indicated he was aware a similar pattern had been manifest when she was previously in Wellington.  He also stated that when she has been to Court for charges, he has seen evidence that she may use this tendency to become elevated, driven, emotional and distressed, in an instrumental way." - What a pack of nonsense!  I had next to nothing to do with police when I previously lived in Wellington or anywhere else for that matter - lawyer Ken Daniels wrote ""I am pleased at the dismissal of a number of charges against you. That is as it should have been in my view. It was always apparent from an early stage that for whatever reason you were a "lightning rod" for Police attention in Carterton. This was, in my view, most unfair to you and unwarranted Police attention resulted in unnecessary charges being laid. On reflection it would have been far better if the Police had been able to discuss any concerns they had directly with you so that those concerns may have been laid to rest in a much more appropriate way." . . . "It is clear that there were many unanswered questions from the Police. We never did get full details from them regarding some of your cases. I have been unable to go back to "the matter of the 2004 letter" simply because of the volume of paperwork and the length of time that it would have taken to have researched that matter. I do know however that numerous letters were sent to the Police and discussions held with them to try and get some satisfaction in relation to the allegations that they made against you. As I have said, those enquiries were not always met with success."