NZ Mental Health Services, Court update:

At left is the certificate written to the Wellington Court by Dr Brenda Sally Rimkeit on 8th March 2011, which contained information which Rimkeit knew to be false, and as a result of which I was detained unlawfully for over three months.  I was "agitated" because I had been unlawfully detained for four days under appalling circumstances, after having been unlawfully imprisoned also in February 2010 after a Court error regarding these matters, and the amicus Bryan Yeoman was being particularly obstructive.  It is utterly untrue to say that I "cannot practicably be examined for the purpose of n assessment report for the court unless she is detained in a psychiatric hospital or secure facilitty under section 38(2)(c)(ii) of the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003."

Rimkeit had accused me of not keeping an appointment with her for an assessment, which had been made in Porirua of all places, a few weeks earlier, and I had told her what I had told Judge Barry the previous week in the Masterton Court: that WINZ refused to assist me when I applied for a recoverable advance for travel costs to get to the Wellington Court and to the appointment which had been made in Porirua, when it should have been made in Masterton like the original appointment with Dr Barry-Walsh, and WINZ should have granted me an advance towards transport costs.  WINZ refused on the grounds that "Work and Income cannot be seen to assist people who do not abide by the law" - which is an outrageous decision, because in civilised societies people are generally presumed innocent unless proven guilty.  Also, I understood that my attendance in Wellington Court was excused pending the assessments and reports being completed.  The process had been further delayed by the amicus curiae Bryan Yeoman who insisted on two further reports after Dr Justin Barry-Walsh wrote that in his opinion I was not suffering from ANY mental illness and in particular, I was not delusional.

Judge Barry accepted my explanation and agreed that the second and third appointments which Yeoman insisted on should have been made in Masterton and not Porirua.  I explained to Rimkeit that I did not need to be detained in a "hospital" for the assessments, I just needed the appointments to be in Masterton or else assistance with the cost of getting to Porirua (not unreasonable requests by any means).  I explained that I was unhappy because I had been locked up for four days unreasonably, on top of being locked up wrongfully already regarding the joined indictment in February last year (details at the link above and this link and others, like this one.)

But Dr Rimkeit insisted that I should be detained in 'hospital'.

The first sentence of Rimkeit's "Summary" are one thing; a depressed and anxious mood, etc, etc: - none of that is evidence of anything other than situational anxiety and claustrophobia, and a feeling of injustice, concern about my employment, responsibilities to animals, etc, all of which were a direct result of my unnecessary and unreasonable detention.

The second sentence of Rimkeit's certificate is really something though:  "Thought pattern is circumstantial and content characterised by overvalued ideas of police corruption and conspiracy by various government departments.  A hospital setting would be most appropriate setting at this time for further assessment of mental state."  Firstly, the evidence shows that my ideas are not overvalued, a view that is also held by other more experienced and well qualified psychiatrists, such as Dr Barry-Walsh, whose report can be viewed at the link above (or the post below, depending on where you are).  Secondly, it is not for Brenda Sally Rimkeit to decide whether my ideas are over valued or whether the idea that I perverted the course of justice is over valued, that is a matter for the Court to decide.  A matter for the Judge and Jury, not Brenda Sally Rimkeit.  Particularly also taking into account the comments by Dr Justin Barry-Walsh: "Her account included a number of persecutory ideas.  However on balance considering her ideas and reviewing the other materials, I do not think Ms Raue has a mental illness, particularly I do not believe that she has a psychotic illness characterised by the development of persecutory delusions.

So after three months of being locked up at the whim (and spite) of Brenda Sally Rimkeit, etc, the Crown pulls the plug on the Perverting the Course of Justice charge, after the course that charge and the joined indictment of Escaping From Custody took through the Courts, the Masterton police prosecutor has obtained four adjournments so far in the Masterton Court, and the matter is being called up again on Monday (tomorrow) , in spite of the fact that police have refused all request from myself and various lawyers for disclosure, or even a Summary of Facts, in spite of the Crown statement that it is not in the public interest to proceed with the prosecution for Perverting the Course of Justice, and: "It is likely that her mental condition influenced her offending.  Continuation of the Court process has potential to fuel Ms Raue's delusions and paranoia.  It may delay or prevent her recovery."  And after several lawyer's letters including 8th July and 4th August 2011 requesting disclosure because "She has a right to know why she was charged.  Not knowing why is impacting adversely on her emotional and mental well being."  And requesting: "Please attend to this matter as a priority."  

No disclosure whatsoever has been provided to date regarding the charge involving an  alleged breach of a protection order.  The other charges are based on the 'evidence' of liars (and will not stand up for this very reason, like most of the other charges brought against me by the corrupt Wairarapa police) but the point is that it is very stressful and debilitating indeed.


After getting no support or advocacy regarding these matters from the Wairarapa Mental Health Services, I requested an email address last week for Dr Wolfgang Kure, so that I could discuss these matters with him.  This is the response I received, and a rather damning indictment it is:

	23 August 2011 18:28
To: kateraue@gmail.com

Hi Kate,

I spoke with Helen Morgan, who was your Case Management and she said you need to write to Dr Kura as emails are not supposed to be given out.

Dr Wolfgang Kura

Hutt Valley  DHB

Te Whare Ahuru

High Street

Lower Hutt

With regard to your advocacy – you could write to the Masterton Trust Lands Trust,  who may be able to help you find someone.  Betty Knox is a person who comes to mind.

Cheers,

Hugh Gaywood-Eyre


I would hazard a guess that he is referring to Betty Knott, the local Health and Disability Advocate, in a classic pass of the buck.  The is not an acceptable response to a request for mental health advocacy and support, and is perhaps why we have such high rates of suicide in the Wairarapa, because it is just typical of the lack of such support and advocacy and the failure of the existing agencies to deal with the matter.

The Court can't have it both ways:  If I was "unwell" when I was alleged to have perverted the course of justice, and was allegedly still so "significantly unwell" as recently as June, and if it was not in the public interest to prosecute me for that charge because of the reasons given in the Crown memorandum, and the claim that it will fuel my alleged paranoia and delusions and delay and prevent y recovery, then it certainly is not in the public interest to continue with these corruptly laid charges which are being called tomorrow.  Watch this space for an update tomorrow in the interests of Transparency in New Zealand.

Hotel Rangipapa - Lunatics in Charge of the Asylum:

The previous post notes how barely qualified "forensic registrar" Brenda Sally Rimkeit, encouraged by corrupt and incompetent amicus curiae Bryan Yeoman, wrote a certificate for the Court at Wellington on 8th March stating that I should be detained in a secure mental asylum in order to have 2 reports completed, knowing full well that this was not necessary, because the only reason I had not attended two previous appointments was because they had been made in Porirua and not Masterton and WINZ unlawfully refused to assist when I applied for a recoverable advance for travel costs.

Judge Barry had agreed with me only a week or so previously that the appointments should have been made in Masterton, and if they had been I would have attended.  This post takes a closer look at the various psychiatric reports etc, and how Rimkeit and some of her colleagues have hijacked the justice system and led to a serious miscarriage of justice.  At this point I'd like to note that the last report Rimkeit wrote announced that she would no longer be practicing as a forensic psychiatrist, the evidence on this site will show you why that is, and why Rimkeit should be charged with Perverting the Course of Justice, making false declarations, intentionally submitting false and misleading documents to the Court, etc.  Here is her "professional opinion" at 22 March 2011:

"It is my opinion (and that of forensic psychiatrist Dr Jacqueline Short, currently my acting supervisor) that Ms Raue is unfit to stand trial.  She currently has a mental impairment which is Delusional Disorder.  Ms Raue has stated on a number of occasions during this assessment period that she feels capable of representing and defending herself against the current charges.  She has suggested that her main line of defence is that the charges are the result of corrupt acts by certain parties and that she will name these parties in Court.  My concern is that if she proceeds to represent herself at Court she may, through her delusional belief system, falsely accuse certain parties of wrongdoing." 
(- 22 March 2011, Brenda Sally Rimkeit)

This is outrageous!  Citizens should be able to accuse the police of incompetence and corruption without being locked in a mental asylum and labelled delusional.   This is after two weeks of her "treatment".


This is evidence of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.  Having been publicly accused, I had the right to a (fair) trial. 



Thankfully there are saner psychologists.  Dr Justin Barry-Walsh wrote the following in his report in November 2009:

"Her account included a number of persecutory ideas.  However on balance considering her ideas and reviewing the other materials, I do not think Ms Raue has a mental illness, particularly I do not believe that she has a psychotic illness characterised by the development of persecutory delusions."  He also says "I would further observe the litigious quality to her presentation means that she has an exaggerated intellectual understanding of court process and would be well capable of following legal process and both entering a plea and instructing a lawyer."  

Dr Barry-Walsh wrote that was his unchanged opinion on 4 March 2011, the day I was arrested.  In other words, if I had a mental illness, it only developed during 'Dr' Rimkeit's "treatment".

Here is the opinion of another psychiatrist, Dr Nick Judson:  

"Ms Raue presented as pleasant, polite, well groomed and looked physically quite healthy and relaxed."  "Her manner was pleasant and quite relaxed throughout the interview and she showed no evidence of any pressure in her thinking. Her speech, while a little speeded at times, was not noticeably pressured and her thought processes were logical and rational throughout the period of the interview.  We spent some time discussing the issues of the court, the charges and her intended defence.  She was able to explain clearly and rationally the way in which she intends to defend herself against the charge and remained focused on this throughout, without introducing any extraneous or irrelevant material and without displaying any paranoid thought processes in relation to the charges."  "Her understanding of the legal issues is very good and she has the ability to formulate and enter a plea and to follow all the matters pertinent to the court."  "Overall my impression is that she will be able to interact successfully with the court for the purpose of conducting her defence.  In my opinion she is fit to stand trial."

Two days after that report was written Crown prosecutor Grant Burstyn filed a memorandum in the Court stating that the Crown suddenly intended offering no evidence regarding the remaining charge!  This is the story of my adventures at the Hotel Rangipapa, where you can check in any time you like but you can never leave.   Actually it's not all that easy to check in either apparently.  All the other women there with the exception of one had come from Arohata Prison, where they had been convicted of murder, or other serious crimes.  The particular circumstances that brought each of these ladies to the hotel Rangipapa were different in each case.  They thought it was hilarious that I was there because Dr Silly Rimkeit had written that I had "Delusional Disorder" because I thought the Wairarapa police weren't up to scratch, and I might "falsely accuse certain parties of wrongdoing" - like the Wairarapa police! - if the matter was allowed to go to trial.  They thought I was making it up until I showed them the report, and the 'evidence' of the Perverting the Course of Justice matter, etc.

So, starting with the first report and working through them:

Dr Justin Barry-Walsh, 2 November 2009

"Her account included a number of persecutory ideas.  However on balance considering her ideas and reviewing the other materials, I do not think Ms Raue has a mental illness, particularly I do not believe that she has a psychotic illness characterised by the development of persecutory delusions."  He also says "I would further observe the litigious quality to her presentation means that she has an exaggerated intellectual understanding of court process and would be well capable of following legal process and both entering a plea and instructing a lawyer."

In relation to the alleged offending Mrs Raue fully appreciated what she had been charged with.  She gave me a detailed and complicated account of the alleged offending and the context of it.  This involved familiar themes that she had been a victim of an earlier incident in February for which she had made a complaint to the police.  In support of this she produced sound recordings from the 111 and Police dispatch systems which she indicated proved the validity of her complaint.  Unfortunately over the course of the interview I was unable to review all of these and therefore cannot comment on the veracity of her account in that area."

The report notes that Court Forensic Liaison Officer Alison Mulholland recommended that Dr Barry-Walsh speak with Carterton Constable Peter Cletus Cunningham, who was the officer in charge of writing the ludicrous "Offence Report" regarding the attack by Michael Murphy on 11 February 2009, and lawyer Ken Daniels, who was not acting for me at the time.  - In other words, two completely inappropriate sources of information.  From the reports:  

"Mr Daniels indicated that he has known Ms Raue over a significant period of time.  He described her as a woman, [sic] who fluctuates in her presentations.  He stated that at times she becomes concerned and preoccupied by injustices, often against her and at such times becomes increasingly emotional and makes a number of representations and writes a nuber of letters to vartious agencies and individuals.  He observed that a number of her concerns often have a kernel of truth in them but appear in some ways to become distorted.  He noted this has been a pattern for a considerable period of time.

Peter Cunningham indicated he has known Ms Raue in his role with the New Zealand Police in Carterton for seven years.  He described a similar pattern to that observed by Mr Daniels.  He noted that Ms Raue develops friendships with people, which goes smoothly for a time, but eventually ends in conflict or breakup.   He speculated this may be when she is confronted with something she does not wish to hear or is otherwise contradicted.  He stated Ms Raue tends to respond by making allegations and complaints to the police and engaging in angry and sometimes offensive behaviour, such as making phone calls.  He noted that she will then quieten down, sometimes for months at a time, before returning to make more complaints.  Mr Cunningham observed that he finds that when she makes these complaints, she often speaks in a rapid, driven manner, with disorganised thoughts that appear "all over the place".  He indicated he was aware a similar pattern had been manifest when she was previously in Wellington.  He also stated that when she has been to Court for charges, he has seen evidence that she may use this tendency to become elevated, driven, emotional and distressed, in an instrumental way.

Ms Raue invited to review her web site, which I did.  In it Ms Raue identified herself as being something of a community crusader seeking to expose corruption and looking for the truth, particularly within local Government and politics.   Considerable focus was an incident at a community meeting.  Her writing was organised and coherent there was no evidence of the kind of evidence seen on interview nor of the kind of disorganisation sometimes seen in psychotic illnesses."  [- no evidence of any delusional ideas either apparently, organised and coherent.]

"Opinion:

Ms Raue in a fifty one year old woman who from accounts has recently presented as irrational, emotional and disturbed.  She has articulated a number of persecutory ideas.  These relate to the current charges before the Court and also her perception of both the unfairness of these charges and also the preceding events.  

Ms Raue displayed marked distress, reported low mood and appeared depressed.  She was pressured on interview and gave a digressive and detailed account of herself.  She was emotional.  Her account included a number of persecutory ideas.  However, on balance, considering her ideas and reviewing the other materials, I do not think Ms Raue has a formal mental illness, particularly I do not believe that she has a psychotic illness characterised by the development of persecutory delusions.

I am unable to establish that she suffers from a mental impairment that would render her potentially unfit to plead.  I would further observe the litigious quality to her presentation means that she has an exaggerated intellectual understanding of court process and would be well capable of following legal process and both entering a plea and instructing a lawyer.

Finally I would observe my concern that she appears depressed at the moment."

- Dr Justin Barry-Walsh, 2 November 2009

So, no concern there of any major mental illness, no delusions noted, no inability to care for myself, no suggestion that I might be a danger to myself or anyone else, and clear validation of my ideas as being not delusional.

Then on 22 March 'Dr' Sally Rimkeit wrote the following:

"It is my opinion (and that of forensic psychiatrist Dr Jacqueline Short, currently my acting supervisor) that Ms Raue is unfit to stand trial.  She currently has a mental impairment which is Delusional Disorder.  Ms Raue has stated on a number of occasions during this assessment period that she feels capable of representing and defending herself against the current charges.  She has suggested that her main line of defence is that the charges are the result of corrupt acts by certain parties and that she will name these parties in Court.  My concern is that if she proceeds to represent herself at Court she may, through her delusional belief system, falsely accuse certain parties of wrongdoing."  

On 31 April Dr Sarfati wrote the following Certificate of Final Assessment (section 14 (2)(b) in support of  the application for a Compulsory Treatment Order:

"Current Clinical Presentation: There is no doubt that Kathryn (sic) can be very pleasant and co-operative.  However her speech tends to be very pressured at times and she goes into great detail to prove a point.  Also it is difficult to interrupt her speech so that the topic will have changed and not be relevant to the question.  Her mood can swing rapidly from euthymic to marked anger.  She has greatly upset other patients in our forensic and had to be placed in safe care for her protection.  She also challenged the integrity of the police and judiciary.

She was initially admitted to Rangipapa Unit from Court under section 38 (2) (c) - Diagnosis of Delusional Disorder - because of poor co-operation in regards to psychiatric assessments.  It was recommended that she be remanded to hospital to enable us to assess her."   Here are the next two pages of the application for a Compulsory Treatment Order.  

 

Dr Safarti cannot even spell my name correctly for a start.  Where it says "Describe to justify opinion regarding abnormal state of  mind:"  He has written: "She has a disorder of mood and is deluded."

Then the form says: " I believe that the abnormal state of mind is to such a degree that it:  Poses a serious danger to the health or safety of that person or of others.  

Describe to justify opinion regarding serious danger or seriously diminished capacity:  

• Placed in self care for her own protection, 
• abusive - could lead to violence towards her.  
• Not able to properly care for herself.  
• Has been suicidal.

Accordingly, in my opinion Kathryn Jane Raue is mentally disordered.

Consultation with family or whanau:  I have spoken to her mother.

31.3.2011

• I was not "placed in self (sic) care" for my own protection at all, I was secluded in an area known as "Rangimarie", the "low stimulus area" and other euphemisms, as a form of punishment similar to isolation and seclusion (where there was only one other patient, who generally resided in that area all the time and had done so for months).  Other patients have read these allegations and signed statements attesting that they are untrue.
• "Abusive"  ?  This is another vague, insubstantiated, nebulous allegation.  I called Sally Rimkeit "unprofessional" and "more delusional than I am". Is that abusive? - "Could lead to violence against her."  In other words:  "Let's lock her up in a mental asylum for the criminally insane in case anyone - unnamed - might take offence at something - unspecified - which she might say and therefore violently assault her."  The specific allegation made to me repeatedly by Drs Short, Rimkeit and Safarti (and Romans) was that vague, unspecified statements made on websites attributed to me might cause offence and lead to violence against me, so I should be locked up.  
• The only two specific examples cited of any alleged delusions were Rimkeit's allegations about the Principal of South End School and a BMW car - no mention is made of a BMW car or any of the alleged beliefs that she attributed to me anywhere on any websites as far as I know, this is a figment of Rimkeit's delusional imagination.  The second example cited by these 'doctors' is that of Michael Francis Murphy, who smashed my door in on 11 February 2009 and then threw a rock through my window in April of this year.  Any right minded person would agree that it is Michael Francis Murphy who should be locked in the mental asylum, not me.  
• Not able, to properly care for herself.  Indeed?  There is no evidence of this whatsoever, and statements from a number of people who know me totally and utterly refuting this allegation.
• Has been suicidal.  Indeed?  Rimkeit's report dated 22 March 2011 has a heading on page 4, "Current charges:  Attempted suicide"  - I have never, ever, attempted suicide in my life, this is yet another figment of Rimkeit's deluded imagination, repeated like Chinese whispers by Safarti, Short, and Romans, etc. A number of patients confirmed my own feelings, that the environment of "the forensic ward" and its inhabitants was far more suicide-inspiring than the alternative freedoms.

This is an absolute travesty of justice, that a recently qualified 'forensic registrar' can cause a jury trial to be manipulated, and pervert the course of justice, in this way.  "It is my opinion (and that of forensic psychiatrist Dr Jacqueline Short, currently my acting supervisor) that Ms Raue is unfit to stand trial.  She currently has a mental impairment which is Delusional Disorder.  Ms Raue has stated on a number of occasions during this assessment period that she feels capable of representing and defending herself against the current charges.  She has suggested that her main line of defence is that the charges are the result of corrupt acts by certain parties and that she will name these parties in Court.  My concern is that if she proceeds to represent herself at Court she may, through her delusional belief system, falsely accuse certain parties of wrongdoing."   - I am the one falsely accused, and I have the right to a fair trial, and the right to an opportunity to remove any doubt about my innocence.  


Having been publicly accused, I have the right to a fair trial and it is an absolute travesty that a barely qualified, inexperienced idiot like Brenda Sally Rimkeit, with the ready assistance of Jacqueline Short, Bryan Yeoman, etc, can get away with perverting the course of justice quite so blatantly.  This post will be updated with further evidence of this corruption of justice.


It is a matter for utmost concern, that sane people can be locked up under these conditions, on the basis of such blatant and indisputably ridiculous tax payer funded claptrap as this, in a so called civilised country, in this day and age; it's more like something out of a third world dictatorship, where citizens are locked up for criticising the state.  Prosecutor Jodi Ongley, amicus curiae Bryan Yeoman, Rimkeit, Short and Safarti and others have deliberated manipulated and perverted the course of justice in order to milk the system for all they can get for as long as possible with this blatant miscarriage of justice, and the Masterton police continue to do so as at 14 August, when they obtained yet another adjournment of the ridiculous charges involving Wayne Friend, Alan Donoghue, James Cowley, etc..  

At left is the relevant page from the Guidelines to the Mental Health Act.  


There is simply no evidence that meets this criteria.  I was simply locked up to stop me making true statements about local police.  Here's an email from police officer Kevin Basher to fellow officer Murray Johnston:


Murray Johnston
Senior Sergeant
Masterton

Kevin Basher---07/09/2010 07:47:45---Something needs to be looked at regarding RAUE using her 'Blog" to make statements regarding our staff.

From: Kevin Basher/POLICE/NZ

To: Murray Johnston/POLICE/NZ@NZPOLICE

Cc:
John Johnston/POLICE/NZ@NZPOLICE

Date:
07/09/2010 07:47

Subject:
Fw: Formal Complaint, Information Request: Assault by police, refusal to take complaints or investigate them properly

----- Forwarded by Kevin Basher/POLICE/NZ on 07/09/2010 07:42 -----
____________________________________________________________


Basher was talking about website posts like this one, and this one, and this one, and this one, and this one, and this one.  Not to mention this one, or this one, or this one.  


This post to be continued.  In the mean time here's a poem by James K Baxter:

The Maori Jesus


I saw the Maori Jesus
Walking on Wellington Harbour.
He wore blue dungarees.
His beard and hair were long.
His breath smelt of mussels and paraoa.
When he smiled it looked like the dawn.
When he broke wind the little fishes trembled.
When he frowned the ground shook.
When he laughed everybody got drunk.


The Maori Jesus came on shore.
And picked out his twelve disciples.
One cleaned toilets in the Railway Station;
His hands were scrubbed red to get the shit out of the pores.
One was a call girl who turned it up for nothing.
One was a housewife who’d forgotten the Pill
And stuck her TV set in the rubbish can.
One was a little office clerk
Who’d tried to set fire to the Government Buildings.
Yes, and there were several others;
One was a sad old quean;
One was an alcoholic priest
Going slowly mad in a respectable parish.


The Maori Jesus said, ‘Man,
From now on the sun will shine.’


He did no miracles;
He played the guitar sitting on the ground.


The first day he was arrested
for having no lawful means of support.
The second day he was beaten up by the cops
For telling a dee his house was not in order.
The third day he was charged with being a Maori
And given a month in Mount Crawford.
The fourth day he was sent to Porirua
For telling a screw the sun would stop rising.
The fifth day lasted seven years
While he worked in the asylum laundry
Never out of the steam.
The sixth day he told the head doctor,
‘I am the Light in the Void;
I am who I am.’
The seventh day he was lobotomized;
The brain of God was cut in half.


On the eighth day the sun did not rise.
It didn’t rise the day after.
God was neither alive nor dead.
The darkness of the Void,
Mountainous, mile-deep, civilized darkness
Sat on the earth from then till now.

Stranger than Fiction - Crown Gives Up the Ghost:

The Crown has given up the ghost of the unlikely chance it had of ever succeeding with the charge of Perverting the Course of Justice, after the joined indictment of Escaping From Custody was thrown out last September. It is over two years since I was charged with the offences, after a remarkable sequence of events. The campaign of harassment and corrupt and malicious prosecution against me by the Wairarapa police (in collusion with various other people) has cost the New Zealand tax payers a small fortune in monetary terms, but the greatest cost by far has been the damage to the integrity of the justice system and the New Zealand police. Not to mention the chilling and shocking insight into the New Zealand mental health system, and how it's used to silence critics of the so called 'justice' system!

After over two years of these corrupt prosecutions the Crown filed a memorandum in the Court dated 15 June 2011 stating that they proposed calling no evidence against me. They had no evidence to offer from the moment the charges were laid. The events of the last five months have been a chilling revelation into mental health services and the justice system in New Zealand these days.

Five months ago, on the 4th March, I was arrested at my home by Constables Paul Dallinger and Mia Wilton, who took obvious delight in pushing me around, handcuffing me, groping me, etc, during the "arrest". When we got to the Masterton police station they told me that the Judge had gone home (a Friday, just after midday) and I'd have to stay in the police station cells overnight. They alleged that I had breached Court bail by not going to psychiatric appointments and Court. I told them what I told Judge Barry only a week or so earlier: After the initial psychiatric assessment had been in Masterton (which I had attended, with Dr Justin Barry-Walsh) I then received two letters advising me of two other appointments in Porirua. I am unemployed, since the police lied to the school I worked at and told the most outrageous lies (police told the school that they'd "recently charged me with an offence involving a child", etc) and I certainly cannot afford to travel to Porirua - twice.

WINZ refused to assist me with an application for (a recoverable grant of) financial assistance on the following grounds: "Work and Income can not be seen to assist people who do not abide by the law"! So much for being innocent until found guilty. Judge Barry agreed with me that this was unacceptable because the appointments should have been made in Masterton in the first place like the initial appointment, which I had attended. I understood that my attendance at the minor Court fixture had been excused pending the reports being completed, it certainly should have been.

My doctor had written police and the Court letters attesting to the serious effect that this campaign of bullying and harassment was having on my physical and mental health. I was regularly suffering depression and claustrophobia from all the hours I was forced to spend sitting in cells, Courts, etc, one letter particularly asked that my attendance be excused if possible and that I not be locked in cells unnecessarily.

The Police Complaints Authority has already upheld a previous complaint about the brutal, sadistic and corrupt actions of the Wairarapa police towards me.

I was finally brought before Judge Davidson in the Wellington Court on Tuesday 8th March after being taken to the Court on the Monday, but being sent back to Arohata Prison because the amicus curiae, Bryan Yeoman, hadn't turned up to Court. While waiting in the horrible graffiti covered, filthy cells that feel like medieval dungeons, in came a woman who introduced herself as Sally Rimkeit. This woman (Brenda Sally Rimkeit) wrote a certificate for the Court that in her opinion I needed to be held in custody to have two psychiatric reports completed to determine whether I was fit to stand trial or whether I was insane. On the basis of her opinion I was remanded to a medium security psychiatric institution, with people who had been found guilty of murder, etc). I was detained there for months, forcibly drugged with serious heavy duty antipsychotic medication, and witnessed, and personally suffered, absolutely appalling 'treatment' at the hands of people, some of whom were WAY more deluded than I am, all at the expense of the good old New Zealand taxpayer. At our first meeting (on 8 March) she told me that she had only recently qualified as a forensic psychiatrist

In her report dated 22 March (after two weeks of 'treatment') "Dr" Rimkeit makes the following statement under the heading "Assessment of fitness to stand trial:"
"It is my opinion (and that of forensic psychiatrist Dr Jacqueline Short, currently my acting supervisor) that Ms Raue is unfit to stand trial. She currently has a mental impairment which is Delusional Disorder. Ms Raue has stated on a number of occasions during this assessment period that she feels capable of representing and defending herself against the current charges. She has suggested that her main line of defence is that the charges are the result of corrupt acts by certain parties and that she will name these parties in Court. My concern is that if she proceeds to represent herself at Court she may, through her delusional belief system, falsely accuse certain parties of wrongdoing." What?!!! I am the one falsely accused, and fully intended to call a witness who will swear on oath that they heard Aaron Brook boasting that Gary McPhee (ex Mayor and drunken bully) paid him money to lie in Court against me, I am perfectly entitled to do this, and it would have most definitely been in the public interest and in the interests of justice for the jury to decide that, not Brenda Silly Rimkeit! It is completely outrageous that a serious criminal trial can be aborted like this because of the mumbo jumbo of mad women like this and malicious doctors like Safarti, who knew perfectly well that I was not delusional, not a danger to myself or anyone else, perfectly well able to care for myself and not suffering from any major mental illness and probably not any minor one either for that matter unless you count depression and situational claustrophobia.

Furthermore, a number of psychiatrists did not share Rimkeit's delusions, Dr Justin Barry-Walsh wrote: "Her account included a number of persecutory ideas. However on balance, considering her ideas and reviewing the other materials, I do not think Ms Raue has a mental illness, particularly I do not believe that she has a psychotic illness characterised by the development of persecutory delusions." He also says "I would further observe the litigious quality to her presentation means that she has an exaggerated intellectual understanding of court process and would be well capable of following legal process and both entering a plea and instructing a lawyer."

Dr Judson's report of 13 June 2011 says: "Ms Raue presented as pleasant, polite, well groomed and looked physically quite healthy and relaxed." "Her manner was pleasant and quite relaxed throughout the interview and she showed no evidence of any pressure in her thinking. Her speech, while a little speeded at times, was not noticeably pressured and her thought processes were logical and rational throughout the period of the interview. We spent some time discussing the issues of the court, the charges and her intended defence. She was able to explain clearly and rationally the way in which she intends to defend herself against the charge and remained focused on this throughout, without introducing any extraneous or irrelevant material and without displaying any paranoid thought processes in relation to the charges." "Her understanding of the legal issues is very good and she has the ability to formulate and enter a plea and to follow all the matters pertinent to the court." "Overall my impression is that she will be able to interact successfully with the court for the purpose of conducting her defence. In my opinion she is fit to stand trial." This makes an utter mockery of Rimkeit's comments and of the Crown memorandum. The Crown never had any intention of allowing this matter to go to trial because they knew perfectly well that it was an orchestrated litany of lies cobbled together in a pathetic attempt to pervert the course of justice by the Wairarapa police, professional leech Bryan Yeoman (there's a link on this site to the Legal Services website showing how much money he's been paid for his "services" and others.

Constable Laura Rhymer lied, fabricated evidence and committed perjury, falsely charging me with offences which she knew perfectly well I hadn't committed. She conspired with other corrupt Wairarapa police officers to conceal serious violent crimes and instead pursue a vindictive campaign of corrupt harassment against the victim of the crimes. I have already been acquitted of the joined count of Escaping From Custody which was thrown out after Crown Prosecutor Ms Andrea Ewing had the good sense (last September) to agree that was the proper thing to do.

If the trial had gone ahead the extent of the police corruption would have been revealed and proven, it is an outrageous miscarriage of justice that the trial has been aborted, and the reasons given by the Crown prosecutor are a pathetic load of claptrap.

These actions were a direct attempt to shut me up for raising awareness and taking action regarding the plague of systemic child abuse in the Wairarapa and the policy of local police who have been covering it up and enabling the abusers, reabusing the victims and the subsequent epidemic of suicide.

Read how after seven years, the so called 'inquiry' has been nothing but a corrupt cover up!

Then read the correspondence from the IPCA - and the blatant and deliberate refusal to acknowledge - let alone investigate - serious complaints from senior lawyers about these matters.

More hatred and vandalism condoned by corrupt Wairarapa Police:

This fake facebook profile was created in the last couple of weeks, and these threats were made on it.  It's the second time these people have created fake Facebook pages.  Police could forensically trace who made these pages very easily, if they were so inclined, unfortunately, they support this behaviour and encourage it and protect the offenders.

On Monday, several local people came to alert me to the graffiti, and a large number of posters stuck up around the town, pushed under shop doors, etc, which contained spiteful and defamatory statements about me.  Many of them said they'd taken the posters to the police station and complained, and that Carterton Police told them that they had spoken to me (named in the posters) which was an utter lie because they refused to speak to me about it, smirking and laughing instead.  I rang the Masterton station and the Police Communication Centre, because the calls are recorded.

I spent hours at the Masterton Police station on Tuesday, trying to make a complaint about this graffiti, and the facebook page (identity theft, and the threats), the theft and vandalism of my property by Rachel Taylor, Wayne Friend etc, among other things.  The officer who came to the counter wrote down about four words on a bit of paper, disappeared for ages , then came back and said they wouldn't be taking my complaints because "they're already being dealt with."  I wanted to make a statement or statements about the complaints, and as usual, corrupt Wairarapa Police refused to take statements, or even acknowledge the complaints.

This is the standard lie from the local police, the exact same lie which has been trotted out since our complaints about the illegal activities at the former Carterton Community Centre involving Georgina Beyer the Liar and the people associated with the Carterton District Council.  One of the more bare faced examples of this is the letter from corrupt and overpaid Tara Sewell of the legal section at Police headquarters.

Police spent a considerable amount of taxpayers money when they charged me with Billsticking (in about 2003) for putting up notices in Carterton advertising a public meeting to discuss the illegal takeover, mismanagement and closure of the Carterton Community Centre.  The excuse given initially (in writing) by the Police for proceeding with the prosecution, which they were later forced to apologise for, was that the notices were defamatory (against Georgina Beyer and members of the Carterton District Council).  Defamation is a civil matter and nothing whatsoever to do with the Police.  Wairarapa Police are ignoring child abuse allegations and focusing their attention on persecuting law abiding people like me, who seek to rid the Wairarapa of the shameful crime, child abuse and suicide which has characterised the area for decades.  The only evidence to support the Billsticking charges was that my fingerprints were allegedly on the notice, but I was acquitted when the Police had no evidence to offer at the trial, because they knew full well that the fingerprints only meant that I had touched the notice in question, and not that I had put it on the building in question on the date in question, which was the Community Centre building.  As I was the Secretary and Treasurer of the Community Centre, it's no wonder Police didn't turn up in Court, because as usual, no crime had been committed.
Compare this with the indisputable evidence of my complaints which are ignored every time.

I asked the Police to ensure that they fingerprinted the notices stuck around the town on Sunday night, these notices were completely different to the notices I am alleged to have stuck up advertising the public meeting, they are extremely nasty, hate filled, offensive, and most certainly defamatory, unlike the ones I put up.  Let's see if Police do, or whether they get rid of the evidence as usual.  There were a large number of the notices given to Police, including several which had been carefully picked up to preserve the prints.  Many were stuck up in view of the security CCTV cameras, I requested the footage first thing Monday morning, let's see if we get it.

Yesterday, corrupt local constable Harvey Pope, who is the spitting image of disgraced Police Deputy Commissioner Rob Pope, recently told not to bother reapplying for his job, arrested me for alleged bail breaches.  I was locked in a cell for most of the day, which Police typed up reams of paper full of excuses why they opposed my bail and tried their utmost to have me imprisoned.  The alleged bail breaches involved me and a friend asking for my property back, including the keyboard which was smashed after I went and asked for it back, from where it was locked in the house occupied by local methamphetamine dealer Wayne Friend and Tim Reynolds.  Police, who have twice assisted their mates to move house while on duty, have refused to assist me at all regarding this matter.  I was living at the address and was assaulted by my partner, the tape of the call to Police during an assault on me at the property after I was invited by Reynold to come and see what Wayne Friend's P addict mate had stolen, is on this site and is clearly evidence of an assault and kidnapping of me.  Harvey Pope wasted hundreds if not thousands of dollars of Police resources trying to corruptly lock me up, but Judge Tuohy wouldn't even let them read out their corrupt little story in the Court and released me.

Last night a huge rock was thrown through my window.  If it had hit my head, I would be dead.  Police are refusing to do anything about any of it, like the other complaints, and the new Area Commander refused to make an appointment with me when I rang him this morning.

We need an urgent inquiry into this Police corruption in the Wairarapa, and NZ in general, one that involves the investigators acknowledging the complaints made by me which have been ignored, and then investigating them.  The complaints about the Community Centre were fobbed off with the excuse that they had been "addressed in previous correspondence" which is nothing more than a pack of blatant lies, when we requested the file on the complaint Police wrote back and said the file doesn't exist - of course it doesn't, because the complaints were corruptly ignored.

 

This is a photo of the creep who complained to Harvey Pope that I was harassing him, Alan Donoghue, who sexually assaulted me last year and has conspired with corrupt Constable Pope - no wonder he's still a Constable! - to cook up a pack of lies alleging that I assaulted him.  Donoghue spent years in prison for armed and aggravated robbery, he is a criminal, who spends his taxpayer funded benefit on drugs and alcohol and spends his days drinking and taking drugs.  Corrupt local Police are refusing to take my complaint about Donoghue's assault on me and charging me instead.  Donoghue's statements go on about how he feels he is a "victim", and he's scared of me and feels intimidated, etc, but Police are ignoring the fact that he and his mates are the ones harassing me.  They came to the address I'm staying at, where the rock was thrown through the window, making a nuisance of themselves after he alleged he felt scared of me - there was no reason for him to come there whatsoever, and if it were true that he feels scared and intimidated, why has he approached me about five times since the charge was laid to abuse and threaten me in front of witnesses?!  He and his mate Darren Hughes (another low life druggie criminal, unemployed, like Donoghue, were caught interfering with my bicycle on another recent occasion and he approached me when I was talking to a person outside the supermarket, witnesses have noted his menacing and unpleasant attitude and demeanor, and Police refuse to issue him with a Harassment notice.  Here he is in the bottle store, stocking up on supplies for the day.

Allan Donoghue, guilty of sexual assault and making a false complaint to Police.

Harvey Pope's whole excuse for locking me up was because Alan Donoghue had complained that I took a photo of him and Constable Pope said I should be locked up to stop me putting information on the internet about people.  Unbelievable.  Constable Pope is like Constable Cunningham, who started all this in the first place, by charging me with Billsticking after trying to arrest me (her read me my rights for heavens sake - and it's one of the few times local police have done so too!) for defamation.  After I told defamation was a civil matter and he wasn't allowed to arrest me for it, he went away, and a little while later I got a summons for Billsticking.  His friends were stealing money hand over fist from the Carterton Community Centre, stealing funds that had been granted to assist the less well off in the community.  They closed down the Carterton Community Centre and stole every bit of money in the ten bank accounts, after saying they were going to give any left over to the IHC on the application to wind up the Centre, they never did, they stole every single cent from the ten organisations "under its umbrella".  This grand Event Centre is just another reincarnation of the trough for the pigs to feed from that was the Carterton Community Centre, because it's run by the same people and their mates, rich lawyers who have hidden agendas, and greedy artists who have figured out how to get plenty of funding for so called community projects.  Sean Crawford received a grant of $1000 just for "having an exhibition" for two weeks at Prime Gallery, a free gallery, as in free to have an exhibition, while we got just $250 from the same people to run the Community Gardens for a whole year.  It was a darn sight harder doing that than Sean Crawford's effort - described by him as "kicking stones".  His work consists mainly of tortured animals, weapons, snarling dogs made of razor wire, and other sharp metal, gun and bomb imagery, etc.  We helped people to establish vegetable gardens and fruit trees, we established gardens in schools, like the South End School.  We got everyone doing their community hours sooner or later too, and trained people in good work habits, and good life habits.  We got them off the streets and into jobs, and rehabilitation programs, etc, and just helped to bring out the best in everyone.  It was a great garden, and a great community centre and we need an inquiry into the manner in which it was taken over and mismanaged and defrauded by the very people behind this Event Centre, opposed by two petitions, the very same people who are still on the Council after years of this corruption and fraud.

Kiwikileaks: Better Work Stories, more Police radio tracks:

The previous post contains links to some of the seven recordings compiled from the 46 tracks on the disk provided by Police in response to my request for the recording of the call to emergency services from Clair Cook and Kelly Wilson, who witnessed the attack on me in my home on 11th February 2009 by Michael Francis Murphy. There are other recordings on other posts, all are accessible through Youtube, search for "Cartoontown".

Here is the link to a compilation from tracks 13, 14 and 15, the link to tracks 18, 19, 20 and 24, and the link to tracks 27, 42 and 43, and the link to track 44, which makes an absolute mockery of the letter from Inspector Wayne Ewers, it's taken me months to edit out the personal details of the half dozen or so other people who's confidential and personal details were leaked to me by police in direct contradiction to this letter, which is in direct contradiction to the boastful announcement at this link, which is standard practise.

Note the comments "give us a call on the cell phone and I'll give you the run down of what the usual deal is there" etc - police know that these radio calls are recorded, and their cell phone calls aren't.

Note also the giveaway um's and ah's in the recordings, and the fabrication of the supermarket story (tracks 18, 19, 20 & 24), which was a lie cooked up by none other than scheming Tracy Feast of 14 Wyndham St, where the attackers went after they left my house (track 9, previous post).

Note these um's and ah's again, and other giveaways like repeatedly ignoring questions, and blatant lies, in the recordings at this link to Wayne Squeals and this one to Tim Bleats, summarised at this post.

The point of all this, is to highlight the waste of tax payer's money being wasted by the Clown Law Office on this blatantly corrupt prosecution and the extent of the corruption of the Wairarapa Police, and the New Zealand Police in general, who should have charged the people who attacked me instead of accusing me of making it up, and trying to say that the witnesses made it up, when it's perfectly clear that the witnesses have always confirmed my evidence not that of the Clown Law Office.

Our taxes are paying to support corruption! Not to mention these RIDICULOUS ads! If they sorted out the corruption in the NZ police they wouldn't have to advertise!

This is the recording of one of the three independent witnesses who rang 111 as they witnessed the violent home invasion and assault on me which police refuse to investigate.