I was sacked from St Matthews school in Masterton and South End School in Carterton after corrupt local police contacted the schools and gave them and other 'community organisations' free access to the lies cooked up by police over the years about me. This is in line with the boasted policy of local police of sharing personal and confidential information with anyone who wants to see it. And this is the result of that policy - good people are sacked on the basis of lies told by criminals, and corruption grows as the bribes are paid and the lies are told. We need an independent complaints service in NZ
Diane Swan of the Privacy Commissioners Office deliberately perverted the course of justice with her email stating: "I understand you had a meeting with Mr O'Leary at which you told him about being charged by the Police, and which is also referred to in the Board of Trustees letter. As you disclosed this information to the School, and it did not collect any further information gathered from Police, there is no privacy issue for us to investigate."
Swan knows perfectly well that the only meeting between O'Leary and I regarding this matter was AFTER I received the letter from the BoT sacking me, and that I told O'Leary that the false allegations are outrageous and totally untrue. Diane Swan deliberately and corruptly refuses to acknowledge the facts and attempts to say that black is white! The Board of Trustees letter is a pack of lies! Your taxes are being wasted on the overinflated wages of corrupt liars like Diane Swan, who waste everyone's time writing BS like this!
It's absolutely obscene that Swan can get away with these blatant lies! She knows perfectly well that the only meeting was after I received the letter! She knows perfectly well that the police told the lies to the BoT - not me! Diane Swan is a corrupt, greedy LIAR:
___________________________________________________
7:24 am 30 March 2010 To Office of the Ombudsmen - (sent by email, no reply despite numerous follow up emails):
I complained to the Ombudsmen about the actions of the Board of Trustees and Principal of the South End School in Carterton and I request that office deal with this complaint because the 'investigation' conducted by the Privacy Office is clearly flawed and deliberately dishonest.
Correspondence to date:
Correspondence to date:
11:57 am 25 March 2010 From Office of the Privacy Commissioner
Dear Ms Raue
I refer to previous correspondence concerning your complaint that the South End School has not provided you with personal information as requested. I have now had a response from the School. It advises that the only personal information it holds about you comprises emails you have sent; a supporting letter the principal Rod O'Leary wrote on your behalf on 9 November 2006; a letter from the Board of Trustees dated 25 March 2009 explaining its concern over an incident; and a copy of an incident report sent to Carterton Police on 5 February 2010.
As you sent the emails to the School you will have copies already. You also have a copy of the Board of Trustees letter as you have provided us with a copy. The School says that you also have a copy of the supporting letter and received a copy of its complaint (or incident report) to the Police during the court process. As such, it does not have to provide this information to you again.
If you have not received this information please let me know. As I have told you previously, you are not entitled to information about the school garden under the Privacy Act as this is not 'personal information' for the purposes of the Act. The School has also told me that it did not collect any information about you from the Police.
I understand you had a meeting with Mr O'Leary at which you told him about being charged by the Police, and which is also referred to in the Board of Trustees letter. As you disclosed this information to the School, and it did not collect any further information gathered from Police, there is no privacy issue for us to investigate.
You are welcome to provide your comments which I would appreciate receiving by 9 April. Regards Dawn Swan | Team Leader, Investigations (Wellington) | Office of the Privacy Commissioner | PO Box 10094 | Wellington 6143 |
2:20 pm 25 March 2010
The penultimate paragraph of your letter in particular, is an orchestrated litany of lies. I didn't disclose any information to Rod O'Leary. No such information existed. There was no such meeting. The first I knew of any allegations of me being charged by the police was when I was warned by a senior staff member that I would be receiving a letter from the Board, sacking me from my job because of an allegation that I had been charged by the police - which I had not been, which makes a mockery of your letter claiming I disclosed something that had not happened.There is no evidence of any such meeting, and if there had been, O'Leary was obliged to make notes, because of the seriousness of the allegations, so where are they?On what date was this meeting alleged to have taken place and where is any evidence of it?Katherine Raue
Firstly, I'd like a response to the email reproduced below, sent five days ago, urgently please. Secondly, the school is deliberately withholding information. There have been a number of complaints from parents regarding the manner in which I have been treated by the staff and BoT and the request for copies of them is well overdue.
Katherine Raue
________________________________________________________________________
The Principal is deliberately lying. There was no meeting at which I disclosed to him that I had been charged with any such offence. I hadn't been charged with any such offence.The Privacy Commissioner's Team Leader knows perfectly well that the letter from the BoT does not refer to any such meeting because it never happened, it is a figment of her imagination and nothing more!Dallas Powell, the Deputy Principal, told me that the Board was planning to send me the letter, which was the first I heard about it, confirming that there was no meeting at which I told the principal.Where is any evidence at all of the alleged meeting?I've never been charged with any such thing so why would I say I had been so I could be sacked, this is outrageous dishonesty!Rod O'Leary is a deliberate liar, which is why he has frequent heart attacks, because he causes violence in the community with his nasty lies, and he knows it. I am informed that Dallas Powell has now taken a year off to recover from the stress of parents abusing her for her lies, bullying and lack of action too.I requested all information under the OIA as well as the Privacy Act which is why I wrote to the Ombudsmen's Office.He is a selfish, greedy, dishonest, politically aspiring, devious gossip, like his mate Gavin Kennedy. They are also thieving crooks.
______________________________________________________________________________________
12:13 pm 31 March 2010 Privacy Commissioner, Ombudsmen
The school is deliberately withholding information, and the principal is lying if he caused you to "understand" any such thing.There have been a number of written and verbal complaints from parents who support me regarding the actions of the staff and letter from the BoT regarding me, and the request for copies of these complaints is well overdue.Where are the dated notes of this alleged meeting at which the principal alleges I told him this rubbish? This claim is an outright lie and O'Leary knows it, so does deputy principal Dallas Powell, who came to my home and told me that I would be getting the letter because of discussions at a Board meeting which were recorded in the staff representatives notes of the meeting, which is how Dallas Powell found out about it.I request those notes also, immediately, and sworn statements from Dallas Powell and the staff rep.The information is urgently required to prepare for Court hearings.
--
Katherine Raue
________________________________________________________________________
11:20 1 April 2010
Dear Ms Raue When I contacted you on 25 March I set out information which the school held about you. I also asked whether you had received: - a copy of a supporting letter Mr O'Leary wrote on your behalf on 9 November 2006; and- a copy of the school's complaint to Police. The school said you would have received this as part of the court process. You have not yet responded to these questions. Please let me know as soon as possible if you have copies of this information. Regards Dawn Swan Team Leader, Investigations (Wellington)
Office of the Privacy Commissioner
________________________________________________________________
5:27 pm 1 April 2010
AND I TOLD YOU THAT THE SCHOOL HAD RECEIVED SEVERAL LETTERS OF COMPLAINT FROM PARENTS ABOUT THE TREATMENT OF ME, AND THAT I WANT THEM PROVIDED IMMEDIATELY BECAUSE THE SCHOOL IS DISHONESTLY PRETENDING THEY DON'T EXIST.
I REQUESTED THE INFORMATION FROM THE SCHOOL AND THE SCHOOL IS OBLIGED TO PROVIDE IT, INCLUDING THE COMPLAINT TO THE POLICE. IT IS OVERDUE, PROVIDE IT IMMEDIATELY - THE FACT THAT i MIGHT GET IT AS PART OF THE COURT PROCESS IS IRRELEVANT I REQUESTED IT FROM THE SCHOOL AND THEY HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE IT - SO PROVIDE THE TWO PIECES OF INFORMATION REFERRED TO IN YOUR EMAIL, AND THE COMPLAINT TO POLICE IMMEDIATELY, ALONG WITH AN EXPLANATION FOR WHY THE SCHOOL'S REPRESENTATIVE IS LYING AND TRYING TO CONCEAL THE COMPLAINTS FROM THE PARENTS ABOUT THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE BOARD AND STAFF AGAINST ME.
FORWARD THIS TO THE OMBUDSMEN IMMEDIATELY AS A FORMAL COMPLAINT ABOUT THE SCHOOL REFUSING TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE PARENTS COMPLAINTS IN SUPPORT OF ME.
Katherine Raue
______________________________________________________________________
2:38 pm 31 March 2010
Dear Ms Raue I refer to your email below and one sent on 30 March. I will contact the school about the complaints or letters from parents you refer to. In terms of the meeting which you allege did not take place, I refer you to an email you sent to the school on 3 September 2009 in which you said: "I met with the principal Rod O'Leary, and told him that the allegation that I had been charged with any offence involving a child was untrue". Your comment that there was no such meeting is either incorrect or you have forgotten that meeting took place. It also appears that you did disclose information to Mr O'Leary during this meeting. If you require information urgently for a court hearing, you should be using the court discovery process. Under court rules each party to a proceeding is required to discover the existence of documents to every other party. This is done using a discovery order. If this information is required for a court hearing, you should ask your lawyer, or the court, about getting a discovery order. We cannot help you in this regard. I will be in further contact in due course. Regards Dawn Swan | Team Leader,
10:14 am 4 April 2010
FORMAL COMPLAINT TO THE OMBUDSMEN ABOUT CORRUPTION IN PRIVACY OFFICE INVESTIGATION O'Leary is lying deliberately, and you are deliberately misinterpreting the facts.The only meeting was AFTER Deputy Principal Dallas Powell came and told me that McPhee and the police had told O'Leary and Kennedy that I'd been charged, I told Powell and O'Leary I HADN"T, in response to the false allegation in the letter, and any meeting occurred AFTER I received the letter.
FOR THE SAFETY OF THE CHILDREN AT THE SCHOOL A COMMISSIONER MUST BE APPOINTED IMMEDITATELY - O'LEARY, KENNEDY AND POWELL ARE LYING DELIBERATELY.
O'Leary is deliberately lying in trying to make out that I ever told him I had been charged.
______________________________________________________________________
10:22 am 4 April 2010 To the Ombudsmen
URGENT:Whether or not I may be able to access information through the Court discovery process I am entitled to the information under the Privacy Act and expect to receive it immediately, IN PARTICULAR ALL THE LETTERS FROM PARENTS TO THE SCHOOL IN PROTEST ABOUT THE ACTIONS OF KENNEDY, POWELL. O’LEARY AND 'WHAIA MICHELLE'.
The refusal of the school to acknowledge the many complaints from parents who support the work I did is an attempt to pervert the course of justice, it is corrupt deceit, the attempt by Diane Swan to manipulate the facts is pitiful, and I request that she is immediately relieved of further involvement in this "investigation" imediately and the Ombudsmen commence a proper investigation immediately. I made a serious allegation of child abuse and it has proven to be well founded and still not investigated, this matter is urgent. There was no meeting until AFTER I received the letter containing the allegation, Diane Swan, Kennedy, O'Leary, Powell, all know that perfectly well and are attempting to pervert the course of justice.
Kate Raue
_______________________________________________________________________
2:10 pm 9 May 2010
Diane Swan:
I have told you repeatedly that the meeting was AFTER I received the letter, and all the evidence makes this perfectly clear.
I don't have copies of the emails you refer to, because they were sent from another computer, and have been deleted from that computer without being saved. Please provide ALL INFORMATION, as requested, including these emails, particularly the one which you refer to in your email, dated 3rd September 2009, IMMEDIATELY. Please print all the emails out and post to 1 Brooklyn Road Carterton.
I have told you repeatedly the details of the matter in chronological order:
I received a visit from the DP Dallas Powell informing me of the notes of the Board meeting and her discussion with the staff representative who attended the meeting.
I told Powell the allegation was untrue and requested a meeting with the Board and staff.
Then I received the letter from the Board.
AFTER receiving the letter from the Board I went to the school and met with O'Leary and told him that the allegation was untrue.
He told me that he had been told by the Police and Mayor McPhee about the allegation.
I consider that your email is an attempt to pervert the course of justice, you know perfectly well that the only meeting was AFTER I received the letter!
I repeat my request that a detailed statement be taken from the former Deputy Principal of the South End School, Dallas Powell, from whom I requested a copy of the notes of staff representative when Powell told me that she had seen them, regarding this matter, confirming that:
She met with me prior to me receiving the letter.
She told me at this meeting that she had seen the notes made by the staff rep of the BoT meeting at which the allegation had been discussed.
I requested a copy of the notes.
I told her the allegation was not true, and told her that I hoped I would not receive such a letter.
I received the letter.
I then requested a meeting with O'Leary and at that meeting told him that the allegation was untrue, as I had previously told DP Powell.
Provide the emails and the letters from the parents immediately, and stop lying about the meeting taking place prior to me receiving the letter - you know perfectly well it didn't!
Katherine Raue.
Friday, December 3, 2010
Glenn Taplin and the Super Maori Fullaz:
The newspaper article below is headed "Family abuse down" and claims that "The number of incidents in region has almost halved" (sic) - What rubbish! Police refuse to acknowledge complaints and abuse, they persecute the victims and protect the offenders. The article describes how police hired some ex cop "Rob Field, who is considered a leading expert on family violence" - by whom? Field came up with a plan to get all the community groups to work more closely together. This is the cause of the problem, not the solution. An independent contractor - yeah right! Numerous people have approached me to describe their own experiences of police violence and corruption in the Wairarapa, providing evidence that their complaints have been ignored or fobbed off like mine have.
The news article at this link was published in 2008, and describes how this strategy works: Police slap a person's file down on the table and let anyone from any of these "community agencies" take whatever they want out of the file. The problem with the strategy is that these community agencies in the Wairarapa are run by incompetent idiots like the ones who were running the former Carterton Community Centre. Bullies like Tere Torea and Gary McPhee. Police have been sharing information with idiots for far too long, and the result is an increase in violence and crime.
Here's a link to another couple of reports about how the Police lie to suit themselves, regarding crime statistics in the Wairarapa. Several people have sought me out recently to report their own horror stories about the Police and the manner in which they respond to domestic violence, one woman was dragged out of bed and attacked by an officer who said "In America it's recognised that 90% of domestic violence is caused by the woman so that's why the woman is always arrested first." She was locked up at the Police station all night, not charged with anything, then released the following day and told to piss off. This woman has in inoperable brain tumour. These photos were taken the following day, she tells me that a few days after this they were considerably more pronounced. The police are out of control in the Wairarapa, protecting the perpetrators of violence, not the victims.
Glenn Taplin is a corrupt cop who refuses to charge Rachel Betteridge and her husband for sending me text messages saying "You need a bullet" and "Watch your back". Have a careful read of this article, Taplin supports the Super Maori Fullaz, like he supports all the other useless little organisations that are all just a front for the individuals running them, and an excuse for those individuals to get their hands on taxpayers money to follow their own agenda. Getting together with your biker mates and going for a bike ride is just an excuse to get publicity and funding and we're sick of it. Piss off back up north Super Maori Fullaz, don't come down here with your BS! We don't need these dodgy organisations and their misguided 'initiatives' about "raising awareness" and "gathering feedback", we want professional intervention for once and a full public inquiry into community services in the Wairarapa, organisation like this are using the problems with violence to get their snouts in the trough, applying for funding and getting huge amounts for their stupid "ideas".
Taplin covered up the fraud, misfeasance and serious assaults at the former Carterton Community Centre,and now the same people who closed it down - assisted by lawyers John Greenwood and Carolyn Wait - are being empowered to build an "Event Centre" which nobody wants. The former community resource centre was taken over following an assault on the Secretary and Finance Officer, who was making enquiries into the serious fraud and misfeasance at the Centre, which was being run as a money trough by the committee, mainly associated with the Carterton District Council. It was being run to cater to local bludging artists like Sean Crawford and Jo Roffe.
The former community resource centre provided resources for the less well off, a phone, computer, internet access for beneficiaries, etc, to empower disadvantaged people.
Thursday, December 2, 2010
Glenn Taplin of the Police needs looking at:
Moreton Rd
R D 2
Carterton
Glenn TaplinN Z Police
Masterton
20 March 2008
Regarding your letter of 30th October 2007:
1. Regarding the response to the two letters sent by Ken Daniels. Your letter states that it is your understanding “the matters have been addressed in previous correspondence.” Please provide this correspondence or specify how the matters were “addressed”. The matters might have been addressed but they certainly haven’t been resolved, although they might have been if Sgt Reid had not left the police force.
1.1. On what date did Sgt Reid leave the force, and for what reason did he leave?
2. Regarding Rachel Betteridge. You have claimed that (a) there is no evidence that Betteridge and her husband sent me any threatening or offensive text messages and phone calls, and (b) you claim that I haven’t tried to make a complaint, which is absolutely untrue and you know it.
2.1. Attached “A” and “B” are statements from two Justices of the Peace confirming the threatening and offensive messages to me from Betteridge and her husband.
2.2. I have previously taken this phone into the Carterton, Greytown and Masterton police stations and tried to lay a complaint. On each occasion I have been told to go away, without the complaint being even recorded. Other people have accompanied me and witnessed this response from the police on several occasions. I have also written the police numerous letters constituting clear complaints and describing how upset I was, and continue to be, to receive these messages, and the continued calls from Colin Allomes, including several in breach of his bail conditions.
2.3. Your response ignores all this, and focuses on your claim that “there was no specific comments by the presiding Judge which gave cause to doubt the credibility of the witness.” These statements from the JP’s, and the messages on the phone, certainly give cause to doubt her credibility, and also prove that she committed perjury, don’t they. Police proceeded with a prosecution against me based on nothing more than the word of a lying prostitute.
2.4. Just like police proceeded with a long drawn out bill sticking charge based on nothing more than the word of “the Postal Service” which was never “put to paper” while police continue to protect the identity of the “complainant”.
2.5. As the defendant in the matter after the police laid charges, I insist that you name the complainant or give a reason why you refuse to do so.
2.6. Provide me immediately with any evidence at all of any of the messages that Betteridge and the police alleged that I sent her (apart from her (lying) word for it, which do not amount to evidence any more than John Crawford’s lies do).
2.7. Police sought no evidence whatsoever from either Betteridge or Vodafone regarding any threatening or offensive messages from me.
2.8. Nowhere in all the information released by the police is there any evidence whatsoever that Betteridge even told a police officer what the alleged messages said, let alone showed the police even one message.
2.9. I repeat my request for all information regarding any communication from the police to Vodafone, such as a request from the police for any information regarding the phone calls or text messages, and all information regarding any details of the alleged text messages.
2.10. Nowhere in the whole file is there any evidence whatsoever, apart from the word of a lying prostitute.
2.11. The transcript of her evidence is an utter joke, especially when compared to the statement and evidence of the only other witness, Betteridge’s statement and evidence are nothing but an utter litany of lies.
2.12. You and Constable Cadwallader told me you were coming to take a statement from me regarding this matter and others. You obviously lied to me, because when you came round, you only served me with the summons for ringing up Colin Allomes.
2.13. The disclosure I have received regarding the latest charges, regarding the summons you served me with, contains no statement from the complainant according to the attached Police Disclosure Receipt, attached “C”. Was a statement taken or not, if so where is it, and if not, why not?
2.14. I have complained a number of times regarding Allomes’ breaches of bail and intimidation of me, and provided evidence of his repeated intimidation of witnesses in the same manner in the past. Further evidence can be easily obtained because his phone is in the name of his employer, it is a business expense and the phone accounts (which they are obliged to keep for 7 years) will clearly show all the calls to me on the dates I have stated they were made. I request police secure evidence of these calls without further delay.
2.15. I told Det Carl Newton and woman police constable “Becks” at Palmerston North that he had rung and threatened to kill me while I was driving to the police station on the night of the assault on 27 April 2007.
2.16. The most recent call was 15 February 2008
2.17. I request again that he be charged with making the threatening calls in breach of his bail, as well as the threatening and offensive calls made both before and after the term of his bail, including the most recent call received last month, which was threatening and intimidating, and intended to frighten me into not giving evidence. I request police immediately obtain the telephone records from his employer, and from Telecom, which show the evidence of the calls.
2.18. I request any information at all that police made any attempts whatsoever to obtain any information from Telecom regarding these seriously threatening calls, I certainly complained, and nothing whatsoever was done about it, except to recently charge me with ringing him up a year ago.
2.19. I request any information whatsoever regarding any attempts by police to obtain any information from Vodafone regarding the seriously threatening text messages which I told Constable Cunningham and other police officers I had received from Rachel Betteridge and her husband. I request evidence of any request made by police to Vodafone regarding Betteridge’s complaint or mine.
2.20. I request this be considered a formal complaint regarding the manner in which the police have dealt with this complaint and the amount of tax payers money wasted taking the matter to Court in the first place.
2.21. I request an apology. I have evidence which has been presented to the police. The ‘Postal Service’ had no evidence, Betteridge had no evidence. Police have clearly used their discretion with prejudice.
3. A prima facie case exists, Mr McPhee boasted of what he did in the newspaper, home invasion is a serious crime, so is assault, much more serious than billsticking or ringing up Colin Allomes is, and he should be charged accordingly.
3.1. I witnessed the violent home invasion and went to the Carterton Police Station to make a complaint. Harvey Pope told me to piss off and mind my own business.
3.2. Did Constable Pope bother to record in his notebook that a person had come in to report witnessing a home invasion and assault?
3.3. I then wrote a written statement and delivered it to the police station.
3.4. At least one other person also wrote a statement and it was also delivered to the police, and when no charges were laid a copy of the statement was delivered to the Wairarapa Times Age.
4. There seems to be an entrenched and endemic problem with the local police refusing to take note of any evidence that doesn’t suit them, and it seems hardly surprising when the Area Commander no less, not to mention the Prime Minister, ignores evidence such as that given by Mr and Mrs Kennedy regarding the attack on me by Georgina Beyer.
4.1. The local police seem to regularly exercise their discretion with bias and prejudice.
4.2. I complained that ‘Ms’ Beyer had stood up, leaned in my direction, pointed at me with forceful stabbing motions, and shouted abuse and threats at me. This was confirmed by written statements from at least six witnesses, including the Kennedy’s, who were impartial, having never previously met me or heard of me.
4.3. I repeat my request that Georgina Beyer be charged with assault. Her behaviour was exactly the same as that Ms Betteridge untruthfully complained of.
5. Regarding the bill sticking.
5.1. I went into the police station to lay a complaint that the lock of the Post Office box belonging to the former Carterton Community Centre Inc had been changed by the manager at NZ Post without authorisation to do so from the Centre.
5.2. I was told by police I would have to provide evidence that I was authorised to access the box, and authorised to make the complaint.
5.3. I went back to the police station the following day with several documents and the original Minutes Book of the Carterton Community Centre.
5.4. I also reminded police that I held the keys to the box and was the only person entitled to do so at that time. Sgt Reid’s letter confirms that I held the keys legally.
5.5. The complaints of Wollerman Cooke & McClure, and the ‘group’ that firm claimed to represent were not upheld in any way by any of the organisations they complained to.
5.6. I was told that police would “look into it.”
5.7. I also complained to New Zealand Post about the matter.
5.8. I was the Secretary and Treasurer of the former Carterton Community Centre and legally authorised to access the box.
5.9. I lawfully held the keys for the box.
5.10. A complaint was made to the police by a group of persons who falsely claimed to represent the Community Centre, that I had stolen property belonging to the Centre, including the keys to the buildings and the post box used by the Centre.
5.11. The letter from Sgt Reid shows that police clearly established that I had the legal right, as Secretary and Finance Officer, to possession of the property, just as I had the legal right to access the post box, and the mail therein. This letter clearly shows that the Police rejected this complaint.
5.12. The letter from Sgt Reid refers to the fact that the complaint of theft against me was made to the police by Wollerman, Cooke and McClure.
5.13. Sgt Reid took some time to look at the evidence and made the right decision.
5.14. Wollerman, Cooke and McClure refused to take instruction from the legal members of the Society or the legally elected Executive Officers. The firm chose to take instruction from the group of people who took over the Centre illegally after the Chairman of the Committee, Tony Feinson, punched me in the face and broke two of my teeth in the office of the Centre, despite being advised by the police that I was legally entitled to represent the Centre.
5.15. I understand that the manager of the Carterton branch of the NZ post is married to a woman who works for Wollerman, Cooke and McClure, please confirm this.
5.16. The complaint to the police by Wollerman Cooke & McClure was knowingly false.
5.17. Evidence of this is a report by CYFS regarding a complaint to them regarding funding, the invalidity of the contract between CYFS and the Carterton Community Centre, and allegations of fraud, corruption, and violence at the Centre.
5.18. This report shows that the ‘group’ who took over the Centre illegally told the investigator that they did not know anything about any missing property in an attempt to conceal the decision of the police regarding who had the legal right to represent the Community Centre and hold the records of the Society, and convince the investigator that all was well at the Centre. This can be confirmed by CYPS or the ‘group.’
You attended a meeting at the Centre at which members were locked out. You said you would come to my home to look at the evidence and take a complaint regarding the illegal activities of the group who took over the Centre. You never did so, just like you did not take the complaints as you recently promised you would do, with Constable Cadwallader, again.
Constable Cadwallader has time to run Chris Webb’s drunken customers home from the Lounge Bar, and help Larry Manson move house, and you obviously have lots of time to write deceitful letters, letters full of deceit.
I request all information held by the New Zealand Police regarding the current charges, or including written information, audio recordings, and all information specified in the attached letter from Ken Daniels to the Police.
I went to the police station and made formal complaints about Gary McPhee’s home invasion, Georgina Beyer’s assault, threatening and offensive text messages and phone calls from Rachel Betteridge, Jason Betteridge and Colin Allomes, and the theft of the property of the Carterton Community Centre and all the organisations under the control of the Centre, I have also requested police take statements from myself and another witness regarding a theft of $500 involving a suspect who lied to police and said she had received a phone call from the witness and I when she had not. Nothing was done about searching phone records or even requesting any information at all regarding that theft, why not?
I look forward to your urgent response.
Kate Raue. STATEMENT:
I am writing to Sgt Glenn Taplin about threatening and offensive phone calls and text messages which I received in January and February 2006.
I received two long phone calls from Rachel Betteridge of Vivian St, Masterton on about January 21st 2006. The calls were on different days.
During these calls Rachel Betteridge said a number of things that offended me.
On 12 February 2006 I received a considerable number of text messages from Rachel Betteridge and her husband Jason Betteridge, most of which were threatening and/or offensive.
Attached are statements from two Justices of the Peace confirming transcripts of the messages which are still stored on the phone, and there is another transcript which has already been provided to the police by both Ken Daniels and myself previously, which includes more messages. I had to delete some of the earlier messages in order to free up memory space to receive the later messages, but I transcribed them before doing so.
I did not initiate communication with Rachel Betteridge on any of these occasions.
I swear that this is true.
Katherine Jane Raue
2. “Please provide this in formation without further delay, and all information regarding the complaint of theft regarding the caravan.”
As above, there is no correspondence or documentation held by Police on the theft of the caravan. Senior Sergeant Johnston advises that this matter was dealt with at the time on the telephone. Your request for this information is refused pursuant to section 29(2)(b) of the Privacy Act 1993 as the information does not exist.
Attached to your letter was another letter dated 20 March 2008 addressed to Sergeant Glenn Taplin. In your letter you request:
1. “Please provide this correspondence or specify how the matters were addressed.”
Sergeant Taplin addressed these matters to which you refer to in your letter, in his letter to you dated 30 October 2007. Sergeant Taplin states:
“it is my understanding that these matters have been addressed in previous correspondence between Mr Daniels and Police or the Police Complaints Authority and yourself and I do not intend to re visit those matters.”
It is my understanding that this matter is closed. If you require further information, please advise Police of the exact information you require in relation to Mr Daniels’ letters dated August 2004 and April 2006.
2. “Provide me immediately with any evidence at all of any of the messages that Betteridge and the police alleged that I sent to her.”
Police are currently trying to locate this information and I will contact you if any information can be located.
3. “I repeat my request for all information regarding any communication from the Police to Vodafone, such as a request from the Police for any information regarding the phone calls or text messages, and all information regarding any details of the alleged text messages.”
Your request for this information is refused pursuant to section 29(2)(b) of the Privacy Act 1993 as the information does not exist.
I note that in your letter to the Masterton Police Prosecutor on 10 October 2007, you advise that “Vodafone wrote to me to and confirmed that they have never received any inquiry form the Police at all regarding this matter.” It is therefore unclear to Police what further information you are seeking.
- So Police admit that they proceeded with a prosecution against me but they never ever had any information to support the prosecution at all, and then when asked by me and my lawyer, Michael Appleby, to obtain the evidence from Vodafone they refused, because they knew it would show that I was the victim in the matter, not the offender, and that Betteridge and her husband should have been charged, not me.
2. “Please provide this in formation without further delay, and all information regarding the complaint of theft regarding the caravan.”
As above, there is no correspondence or documentation held by Police on the theft of the caravan. Senior Sergeant Johnston advises that this matter was dealt with at the time on the telephone. Your request for this information is refused pursuant to section 29(2)(b) of the Privacy Act 1993 as the information does not exist. - What utter lies!
Attached to your letter was another letter dated 20 March 2008 addressed to Sergeant Glenn Taplin. In your letter you request:
1. “Please provide this correspondence or specify how the matters were addressed.”
Sergeant Taplin addressed these matters to which you refer to in your letter, in his letter to you dated 30 October 2007. Sergeant Taplin states:
“it is my understanding that these matters have been addressed in previous correspondence between Mr Daniels and Police or the Police Complaints Authority and yourself and I do not intend to re visit those matters.”
It is my understanding that this matter is closed. If you require further information, please advise Police of the exact information you require in relation to Mr Daniels’ letters dated August 2004 and April 2006.
2. “Provide me immediately with any evidence at all of any of the messages that Betteridge and the police alleged that I sent to her.”
Police are currently trying to locate this information and I will contact you if any information can be located.
3. “I repeat my request for all information regarding any communication from the Police to Vodafone, such as a request from the Police for any information regarding the phone calls or text messages, and all information regarding any details of the alleged text messages.”
Your request for this information is refused pursuant to section 29(2)(b) of the Privacy Act 1993 as the information does not exist.
I note that in your letter to the Masterton Police Prosecutor on 10 October 2007, you advise that “Vodafone wrote to me to and confirmed that they have never received any inquiry form the Police at all regarding this matter.” It is therefore unclear to Police what further information you are seeking.
__________________________________________________________________________________
So, if there was nothing put to paper, what's this?
These allegations are lies, which is why the police ignored them. The illegal "group" then wrote this letter to Oasis Trust:
- Oasis responded with THIS:
Privacy Commissioner approves of Police breaking the law:
Local police are blatantly breaking the Law, throwing hundreds of child abuse files in the rubbish bin and lying about it, and "sharing information" with the many incompetent and unprofessional people involved in running local "community agencies", organisations, etc:
Police bend rules in battle to curb domestic violence. - Dominion Post October 2008.
POLICE are flouting privacy laws to save the lives of domestic violence victims.
Officers battling to curb domestic violence in a region described by one murderer as “the most evil valley in New Zealand” are sharing files relating to offenders and victims with agencies that are not party to official agreements allowing information-sharing.
The decision to bend the rules has the support of agencies receiving the potentially life-saving information — and even the privacy commissioner accepts privacy laws should not stop information sharing where safety is at stake.
In a broad approach to curb domestic violence, Wairarapa police identified the 10 most violent families in 2003 and began working with three of them.
The worst family was seen by police for serious violent incidents every 14 days on average — 25 emergency calls in a year. There were a further 49 callouts for crimes committed by children in the family, which police say were linked to seeing their father assault their mother.
Another 40 families are now on the list, though police say that is just the tip of the iceberg as many domestic violence incidents fall below the radar.
Wairarapa’s police chief, Inspector John Johnston, said his staff no longer waited for permission before sharing information with non-governmental anti-violence agencies not covered by memoranda of understanding or agreements covering government agencies.
Investigations by commissioners into child murders, such as those of Masterton half-sisters Saliel Aplin and Olympia Jetson in 2001, blamed a lack of information-sharing for the deaths and continuing cycle of violence.
Mr Johnston said it was better to say sorry later than put a life at risk. “We are prepared to go to a meeting with all the agencies and slap a file on a desk and say, ‘Take out of it what you want," and hell yes, it is making a difference.
“In the past we would not have taken that step. Now we say, ‘You can see the situation clearly, we don’t care if it’s the weekend and a bean-counter has said wait tifi Monday. Just get that kid out now.’”
Privacy Commissioner Marie Shroff said that, though police needed to consider the Privacy Act when disclosing personal information, it was a question of trust. “We don’t expect the police or other government agencies to share our information without a good reason for doing so. For example, it may be necessary
to disclose information to avert a threat to someone’s safety.’
She said agencies should still have a clear policy on what they disclosed, to whom, and when.
Women’s Refuge Wairarapa coordinator Lyn Buckley said that, when it was about safety, the rules surrounding privacy had to move. “You can have all the rules about silence that you like but if that child is still at risk what good is that? It is about that child’s safety.”
Mr Johnston said the focus on at-risk families would not stop. “A Mongrel Mob member — a convicted murderer — said to me, ‘This is the most evil valley in New Zealand. It is where you kill your kids.’
“It made me think hard about the area we live in and even more determined to make it a safer place ... for our children especially.”
There were numerous complaints about McPhee's drunken violent home invasion in 2005, which Police refused to even acknowledge, he was also involved in the attack on me in my home in February 2009 which is well documented.
POLICE are flouting privacy laws to save the lives of domestic violence victims.
Officers battling to curb domestic violence in a region described by one murderer as “the most evil valley in New Zealand” are sharing files relating to offenders and victims with agencies that are not party to official agreements allowing information-sharing.
The decision to bend the rules has the support of agencies receiving the potentially life-saving information — and even the privacy commissioner accepts privacy laws should not stop information sharing where safety is at stake.
In a broad approach to curb domestic violence, Wairarapa police identified the 10 most violent families in 2003 and began working with three of them.
The worst family was seen by police for serious violent incidents every 14 days on average — 25 emergency calls in a year. There were a further 49 callouts for crimes committed by children in the family, which police say were linked to seeing their father assault their mother.
Another 40 families are now on the list, though police say that is just the tip of the iceberg as many domestic violence incidents fall below the radar.
Wairarapa’s police chief, Inspector John Johnston, said his staff no longer waited for permission before sharing information with non-governmental anti-violence agencies not covered by memoranda of understanding or agreements covering government agencies.
Investigations by commissioners into child murders, such as those of Masterton half-sisters Saliel Aplin and Olympia Jetson in 2001, blamed a lack of information-sharing for the deaths and continuing cycle of violence.
Mr Johnston said it was better to say sorry later than put a life at risk. “We are prepared to go to a meeting with all the agencies and slap a file on a desk and say, ‘Take out of it what you want," and hell yes, it is making a difference.
“In the past we would not have taken that step. Now we say, ‘You can see the situation clearly, we don’t care if it’s the weekend and a bean-counter has said wait tifi Monday. Just get that kid out now.’”
Privacy Commissioner Marie Shroff said that, though police needed to consider the Privacy Act when disclosing personal information, it was a question of trust. “We don’t expect the police or other government agencies to share our information without a good reason for doing so. For example, it may be necessary
to disclose information to avert a threat to someone’s safety.’
She said agencies should still have a clear policy on what they disclosed, to whom, and when.
Women’s Refuge Wairarapa coordinator Lyn Buckley said that, when it was about safety, the rules surrounding privacy had to move. “You can have all the rules about silence that you like but if that child is still at risk what good is that? It is about that child’s safety.”
Mr Johnston said the focus on at-risk families would not stop. “A Mongrel Mob member — a convicted murderer — said to me, ‘This is the most evil valley in New Zealand. It is where you kill your kids.’
“It made me think hard about the area we live in and even more determined to make it a safer place ... for our children especially.”
TRAGIC TOLL:
June 1992: Raymond Ratima stabbed to death two adults and five children in Masterton — three of them his sons. Ratima approached 13 sources for help in the 24 hours before the killings.
July2000: Hinewaioriki Karaitiana-Matiaha (Lillybing), 23 rnonths, after being shaken by her aunt, Rachealle Namana in Carterton. She was found to have been scalded and to have suffered genital mutilation capable of killing her, had she not been shaken to death,
January 2001: Two-year-old Thomas Schumann suffocated by ex-boxing champion Hugh Bryant, 23, who was boarding in Masterton with relatives. Bryant found not guilty by reason of insanity.
December 2001: Saliel Aplin, 12, and Olympia Jetson, 1 stabbed to death in their beds at the Masterton home by stepfather Bruce Howse. The community was shocked as allegations of sexual and physical abuse, and details of frequent intervention by social agencies, emerged at Howse's trial.
September 2003: Featherston’s Coral-Ellen Burrows, 6, beaten to death by her mother’s partner, Steven Williams, who was high on P. Coral-Ellen’s birth father had called CYF nine months earlier to say he was worried about his children.
_______________________________________________________________________________
This policy of sharing information is adding to the problems, not solving them. The standard of the people 'working' for the 'community agencies' is appalling The police are sharing information with the offenders in many cases. For example, local "advocate" Tere Torea. I was advised by local community organisations to ask Tere Torea for assistance - what a mistake! Here is a picture of his appalling, and uninviting window display for his "social services organisation.
I rang him and explained my problem, he then turned up at my home and brought his mate, Dave, who he informed me used to be employed at Rimutaka prison, until he was sacked for bringing contraband into the prison. I was horrified that he could bring this loutish mate of his to my home without even asking me if I minded him blabbing about my personal matters with his extremely dodgy mates let alone bringing them to my home. At the end of our "meeting", Torea insisted on us all saying a prayer, then he insisted on giving me a hug - a disgusting embrace of his fat smelly body, which nearly made me sick!
Torea said he'd pick me up and take me to Court the following day, but sent 'Dave' instead. I reluctantly got into his unwarranted old bomb of a car (only because I had no other choice at such late notice) and was taken - not to the Court at all, but to Dave's house.
I was taken inside and told that Tere Torea would be meeting us there and we would go to Court from there. I immediately felt very uncomfortable and asked Dave to take me straight to the Court and Torea could meet us there. Dave refused, and eventually Torea arrived and started shouting at me in an authoritarian manner about how we had to do everything his way and let him do all the talking in Court - he has no law qualifications or any other qualifications for that matter! He started to go on about working with the police rather than against them and how I should plead guilty to the ridiculous charges. He refused to listen to anything I said, shouting and sulking and throwing his weight around and finally I had to walk to Court. He is an utter creep, who receives funding because he tells the funders he does this and that and provides advocacy for people like me when nothing could be further from the truth! Women do not want hugs from disgusting creeps like him, I've spoken to other women who have also experienced his disgusting groping and religious BS. These are the people the local police are "sharing information with".
Above is the disgusting window display for his "Services", and a newspaper cutting regarding the murder of Paul Irons, saying the sentences given to the killers were an insult to all Maori. Paul Irons wasn't Maori, the 3 men that murdered him were, and the whole community was responsible, just like they were all responsible for Coral Ellen Burrows murder too, because these men were always time bombs waiting to go off and nobody said a thing. Torea is mates with the killers, and using Iron's family to raise his own profile with this rubbish. Local Wairarapa TimesAge chief reporter Nathan Crombie, and other journalists, are responsible for promoting Torea and his unprofessional mates. Others who the local hack journalists promote include the following:
Ex Mayor Gary McPhee, who is on the committee of Victim Support, who told me to piss off (like Woman's Refuge manager Lyn Buckley, quoted in the news article about the Privacy Act breach policy), after the home invasion by Michael Francis Murphy in 2009.
There were numerous complaints about McPhee's drunken violent home invasion in 2005, which Police refused to even acknowledge, he was also involved in the attack on me in my home in February 2009 which is well documented. Victims of violence are committing suicide in droves locally because this is what passes for advocacy and leadership in the Wairarapa. "Tell someone" Barry Taylor says - we've told him that the victims of violence and bullying and abuse in the Wairarapa are having to suffer further abuse and violence when they try and "tell someone" like Gary McPhee, who is on the committee of Victim Support, after committing a violent drunken home invasion at a local flat, and incompetent and/or unqualified people who don't know what they're doing.
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Kiwileaks Exclusive: Privacy Commissioner, Corrupt or Incompetent?
This was despite an earlier visit from the Deputy Principal, to ask me if the allegation was true, because she had been so shocked to discover that the Board was proposing to send me the letter. Of course, I told her in no uncertain terms that this was utter rubbish, and that I had never in my life been charged with any such offence, never mind recently! I was therefore very surprised indeed to receive the letter some 6 weeks later saying: "The Board of Trustees were distressed to hear of you recently being charged by the police. The vetting policy at the school is designed to reduce risk to the children at South End School. Whereas your previous Court incidents did not have this risk the present one involves a child. This does present a risk and therefore a problem for the Board. With this charge over you the Board of Trustees requests that you stop your work in the school gardens. Should you be found guilty of the charge the Board could not permit you to resume your work on the school garden. As a Board we hope that either the charges are withdrawn or you are found not guilty of the charge as this would remove our problem. We appreciate the work and enthusiasm you bring to the school garden and hope that we can be in a position to resume this work in the near future." - what hypocrisy and lies!
Of course I immediately rang the school and made an appointment to see the Principal, Rod O'Leary, who I had previously had a very good relationship with through my job at the school teaching gardening and running the school gardens, which I was solely responsible for creating and developing. The school gardening program I introduced was wildly successful. It brought out all the best qualities in the kids, and they learned so much, because gardening is a holistic sort of process, and it teaches kids to look at life holistically, it teaches commitment, planning, risk management and all sorts of interesting things as well as growing food, a very basic but essential life saving skill, especially in these economic times.
We met and I told him that the allegation in the letter was untrue. I requested all information the school held about me, and in particular all information regarding the letter sacking me because of the false and extremely offensive allegation. The meeting was pleasant, but I was clear about how I felt about receiving the letter from the Board, after I'd made it perfectly clear to the Deputy Principal that the allegation was untrue when she had put it to me 6 weeks earlier. I asked for a meeting between myself and the Board as soon as possible. This request, and all other requests for a meeting with the Board were refused, as was the request for information.
I wrote a considerable number of letters to various individuals and organisations, all of which concentrated more on explaining to me that it wasn't really an issue they wanted to deal with for one excuse or another. This letter from the Privacy Commissioner's Office is a good example. The Principal provided one or two documents to me and told the Privacy Commissioner that was all the information. I asked for the minutes of the Board meeting where it was decided to send me the letter, and the notes of the staff representative, which the Deputy Principal had told me she had sighted, documenting that the Police had given the Board the erroneous and slanderous information, along with other false, slanderous and defamatory information. This would be in accordance with their announced policy of sharing gossip with anyone who's interested: (Click on these images to enlarge, or open them with Paint program.)
The principal lied to the Privacy Commissioner, repeatedly stating that no other information existed, well after he, and the Board of Trustees, had received a number of complaints from parents. When confronted with the evidence, in the form of a copy of one of the letters of complaint, he was forced to accept its existence, grudgingly.
Contrast this with the article in the Dominion Post October 2008 which boasts how police blatantly flout the privacy laws, giving free access to basically any idiot on the committee of any little community organisation.
The people in charge of the community organisations in the Wairarapa are mainly corrupt and incompetent (a notable exception being Ken English of the Heart Foundation, and I wish him all the best in his retirement, he deserves it and we'll all miss him a lot). This article quotes Lyn Buckley of Women's Refuge, Masterton, who told me her organisation wouldn't be assisting me in any way when I asked if they could assist with urgent accommodation and assistance after the recent assaults at what's now Gallon Road. There's no shortage of greedy, incompetent, unscrupulous and outright corrupt people running so-called 'community organisations' round here (and elsewhere I suspect).
I had also written to the Privacy Commissioner about the refusal of the Police to provide an audio recording of the call to 111 emergency services from Clair Cook and Kelly Wilson regarding the attack on me in my home by Michael Francis Murphy of 18 Wyndham St Carterton on 11th February 2009, and the letter from the manager of the Police Communications Centre, Inspector Wayne Ewers, in which he states the reason for the refusal: "according to the Privacy Act you are not entitled to any information that is created by other people." - what rubbish! Rubbish which the Privacy Commissioner and the Police have refused to acknowledge. The newsclipping file has deteriorated (Bob told me about jpeg files), readers might like to try and get a copy from the offices of the Dominion Post, it was on the front page in October 2008, next to an equally large photo of a female police officer breastfeeding her baby instead of doing what she's paid to do, exposing way more breast that Christine Rankin.
I told the Privacy Commissioner's investigator, Diane Swan, that Deputy Principal Dallas Powell had told me that she had seen the notes of the meeting, that they were clearly about me, and that she would verify that I told her the exact opposite of what O'Leary claimed. I also asked for any evidence whatsoever of O'Leary's claim, such as notes, incident reports, anything whatsoever, and asked her to contact Deputy Principal Dallas Powell and ask her directly, and obtain a statement from her about the matter.
Swan rudely refused, like Mike Flahive, who signed this rude letter - how much taxpayer's money was wasted - or pocketed by him and Diane Swan - over this little racket?! I DID NOT TELL O'LEARY ANY SUCH THING HE IS A CORRUPT LIAR WHO HAS PROFITED CONSIDERABLY FROM THIS CORRUPT CONSPIRACY.
Then a few things happened. Deputy Principal Dallas Powell left the school abruptly. I was issued with a trespass notice, preventing me accessing my tools and equipment at the school. When I was hailed by the school's bullying and lazy groundsman one day I responded by stopping and asking him to move our property from his locked shed on the grounds to the gate so that I could remove it from the site, and when he said it was not going to be returned, I called him a thieving crook, and the Principal, who he was speaking with at the time, and was charged by the police with using insulting language. All three prosecution witnesses failed to turn up to the hearing, wasting considerable Court time, Police time, and public resources, after numerous preliminary Court fixtures.
Court Summary of Facts, written by corrupt Constable Harvey Pope states: "In 2009 the defendant RAUE was Trespassed from the grounds of CARTERTON South end School (sic). She was at the time a volunteer at the school and involved with the school's vegetable gardens. During this involvement her bad behaviour in front of the pupils caused the schools' teachers and board members to become concerned. Efforts to sever ties with RAUE turned hostile." The document alleges that I was cycling past, stopped and shouted "abuse" at the "Principle and grounds man" (sic). A very serious crime in Carterton apparently.
Efforts to sever ties - like sending me a letter accusing me of child abuse and a trespass notice effectively stealing my property - certainly did turn hostile in the face of the obvious lies and corruption. There was no "bad behaviour" because if there had there would undoubtably be some record of it, such as a single incident report, a note, there's nothing at all, and there is considerable evidence from witnesses that this is an utter lie.
What a waste of taxpayers money this all is. Are people too stupid to see it, or what?
Sgts Basher, Wilson and Peters need looking at - again:
This is the house I was bailed to in February, by corrupt Police and Court staff, despite Police having me sent off to prison not long ago, after they successfully opposed it as a bail address on the grounds that I had "previously been the victim of violence there." After being then ordered to live there by the police and the Court, I was assaulted again and robbed.
Lawyer Frank Minehan was representing me at the time, to the best of his ability under the circumstances, and has faithfully written a letter about it. Frank's a good lawyer, unlike his boss, Ainslie Hewton. More about that later. Police opposed the address last September and the Court sent me to prison accordingly. Suddenly Police and the Court changed their mind and ordered me to live there in February. A woman called Kirsten Grenfell who works for Barnardos in Upper Hutt began causing trouble soon after this, she'd had a brief fling with the owner of the property, Tim Reynolds, about a year previously, when she wanted to make her ex husband jealous, when that worked she dumped him, and told him not to contact her, then she suddenly turned up in about May with all her baggage, and resumed the affair. She made it quite clear that she wanted me gone.
Kirsten Grenfell had sent emails through the Barnardos email account after she dumped Reynolds, gossiping about me, and telling people that I'd moved in with the owner of the property, and other personal information which was nothing to do with her, titled "This is a Taita Community Initiative for Barnardos New Zealand." I'd been very annoyed at the time I discovered this, because of the content of the messages, but had taken no action at the time, but after she turned up and made it clear she wanted me out I sent her an email telling her not to send any more emails about me to my friends (a totally reasonable request). She had told him not to contact her when she dumped him, but suddenly when someone else moved in she started sending emails to our friends titled "The Tim Report", telling our friends, who she barely knew, about us, in an effort to worm her way back in to his life.
Then Grenfell rang Reynolds and told him to get rid of me if he wanted to keep having it off with her while her husband was at work, so he did. Which presented a problem regarding my bail address, among other problems. It's ironic that Barnardos run courses in dealing with domestic violence when their staff are busy causing it with emails marked "This is a Taita Community Initiative for Barnardos ." Grenfell is an overpaid bit of fluff.
Kirsten Grenfell had sent emails through the Barnardos email account after she dumped Reynolds, gossiping about me, and telling people that I'd moved in with the owner of the property, and other personal information which was nothing to do with her, titled "This is a Taita Community Initiative for Barnardos New Zealand." I'd been very annoyed at the time I discovered this, because of the content of the messages, but had taken no action at the time, but after she turned up and made it clear she wanted me out I sent her an email telling her not to send any more emails about me to my friends (a totally reasonable request). She had told him not to contact her when she dumped him, but suddenly when someone else moved in she started sending emails to our friends titled "The Tim Report", telling our friends, who she barely knew, about us, in an effort to worm her way back in to his life.
Then Grenfell rang Reynolds and told him to get rid of me if he wanted to keep having it off with her while her husband was at work, so he did. Which presented a problem regarding my bail address, among other problems. It's ironic that Barnardos run courses in dealing with domestic violence when their staff are busy causing it with emails marked "This is a Taita Community Initiative for Barnardos ." Grenfell is an overpaid bit of fluff.
Note the photos at this link of my Court papers (nearly half way down the page) and other things, thrown outside into the mud and rain. I was assaulted there again on the night of 1st September 2010, and the assault was recorded in a phone call to police, by Wayne Friend, who has been selling my belongings to pay off his drug debts and letting his P addict mates into the house while Reynolds, is at work, to steal my belongings. Friend was left in charge for about 6 weeks when Reynolds went on holiday, Friend changed the locks, preventing me accessing my own property, to facilitate the thefts by his mates. When confronted by Reynolds about the thefts, Friend told him he'd caught fellow P addict Rachel Taylor in my room taking my things. They've both refused to make statements to Police about it.
Reynolds sent me a message telling me about this, and invited me to come and see what was missing and secure my room. Almost as soon as I arrived Friend began causing trouble. Shouting and trying to block my way. Then he called Police, on *555 apparently, to report to the Police that I was trespassing and being rude to him, or whatever. He should just have made himself scarce! Or told Police about Rachel Taylor's theft of my property. Neither he or Reynolds have ever made a statement to Police about it apparently. So Friend called Police in spite of the fact that he had no authority at the property whatsoever and I'd been expressly invited there in writing by the owner of the property to see what Friend and his mates had stolen.
Friend babbled on the phone to the police, I ignored him and started checking what was missing. I had brought a medium sized backpack to collect some property (can't carry too much on a bike) and after checking the contents of a couple of writing desks in the dining room I went down to my room at the other end of the house. There I was thankful to find a little blue box with fairies on it and one of those tiny little ballerinas that spin around while it plays music. Inside it is a little blue bottle with some of the ashes of my brother David. I put it in the backpack.
Friend and Reynolds were now standing in the doorway screaming and shouting at me, I could hear Friend on the phone going "Yeah she's taken something, I saw her" and Reynolds was shouting "what have you taken?" I told him I hadn't taken anything. As they got more and more wound up and aggressive I just wanted to take the little blue box and get away from them, so I tried to leave. Friend blocked my way and babbled on with his running commentary to Police, I tried to get past him and out to the door, Reynolds grabbed the backpack from me and started going through it. As I tried to take the backpack from him he punched me twice in the side of the head. When he'd finished going through it, he realised that I hadn't taken anything after all. I managed to get the backpack from him and immediately tried to get out the door.
Friend said "Grab her Tim, the cops are on their way" Reynolds grabbed me from behind, they were both shouting at me at once and my ears were still ringing from the punches. A struggle ensued as I tried to get away. This went on, and on, and on, as Friend babbled away to the Police call taker. Finally, after a very long time, I heard Friend say: "The cops said to let her go Tim, they're not coming." Whereupon Reynolds stopped the assault, which also amounted to a kidnapping legally speaking and I left. I have requested the tape of the phone call, police have failed to provide it, and are refusing to take my complaint of assault, etc.
Friend is now taking me to Court for wilful damage of an aquarium, and even his mates say he's lying through his teeth.
Here's a couple of photos of how Friend trashed my car while Reynolds was away. He also strew broken glass throughout the drawers of my dressing table and squashed a great deal of fresh putty into my clothes, ruining them. So while the local corrupt cops are hammering away at me all the time for not wearing my bike helmet, this is the kind of violence they encourage, and turn a blind eye to. Violence is out of control in the Wairarapa, because the police condone and encourage it. The police themselves are rotten to the very core. New cop Paul Dallinger is an absolute psychopath, from Dannevirke, more on him later.
I've just received a text message from Reynolds to say he's going to throw my property outside on the road on Saturday and give me a trespass notice - he and the police have allegedly given me several of them - that's why I can't go and get my things! The reason given is that he says he's sick of my alleged "narking and thieving." He alleges I stole his remote control of all things - what a joke, he needs to face up to reality! The reality is that Wayne Friend is a lying thieving drug addict, which is why his own mother doesn't want him living with her. As for 'narking' - what a joke!
Sgt Murray Johnston assured me a couple of weeks ago that he would personally ensure that Reynolds not touch my property until these matters are sorted out. I have tried to contact him, and Sgt Kevin Basher (should be two links there).
And while we're on the subject of photos, here's the staff member at the local Mobil garage, Smith, Hare and Christison, who defrauded my bank account of $60 last week, to avoid any suspicion being cast on other members of staff. He, together with another male staff member of similar age, and a manager called Blaine, were all involved, and laughed their heads off when I asked for a phone to call police and a pen and paper to make a written request on the spot for the CCTV, right before they threatened and intimidated me and tried to take my bike. Avoid this thieving little creep at all costs, and the chubby old bald guy with the Charlie Chaplin moustache.
I got the distinct impression that staff at this garage have been defrauding their customers for a long time with credit card scams like the one they pulled on me, and I'd advise people to stay well away from this garage, and if you are silly enough to go there, don't give them your bank cards.
 |
| Staff Thief, Smith Hare and Christison. |
Sgt Murray Johnston told me recently he would ensure the safety of my property which is in Reynolds' house until these matters are properly sorted out. He is refusing to speak to me on the phone or respond to messages left on his answerphone. I have also been put through to Sgt Kevin Basher and relayed my concerns about Reynolds' threats to him, he said he would get back to me, and hasn't, and when I rang back staff refuse to put me through to him.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)