More lies from the corrupt Wairarapa Police as they frantically try to cover their tracks:

This is a letter from the police to me regarding the complaints to the PCA, This is a letter from the police to me regarding the complaints to the PCA, Ombudsmen etc, regarding various corrupt acts of the Wairarapa police, page one is reproduced as the original, page two was scanned in a different format and so is typed below, while page three is reproduced in original form: So page one is at left and page two follows here:

1. “All information regarding police file 010518/2481’


There is no file with that number held by Police therefore your request for information is refused pursuant to section 29(2)(b) of the Privacy Act 1993 as the information does not exist.


2. “All information regarding a complaint of theft by the same group of people against myself and Jennifer Armstrong and Oasis Trust regarding a derelict caravan on the site of the former Carterton Community Gardens in Moreton Road.
I am advised by Senior Sergeant Johnston there is no correspondence or documentation held by Police on the theft of the derelict caravan. He further advises that this matter was dealt with at the time on the telephone. Your request for this information is refused pursuant to section 29(2)(b) of the Privacy Act 1 993 as the information does not exist.


3. “All information regarding the complaints relating to the illegal takeover, fraud, theft of mall and theft of all assets of the former Community Centre”

Police currently have insufficient information to locate the information that you have requested. Police will require more information from you in order to locate the information.

Please provide Police with details such as the date(s) of the above mentioned incidents, the approximate time(s) of the incidents, any Police staff involved and what specific information you require from Police.

Police will consider and process your request for information once further details are received.

4. “All information regarding the phone calls made to the police by Larry Mason (through 111 emergency services I believe), Rachel Betteridge and Ewen Hyde (either 111 or directly to Masterton Police station), including all transcripts and audio recordings, job sheets, etc regarding the complaints made against me to the police by these people”

Police currently have insufficient information to locate the information that you have requested. Police will require more information from you in order to locate the information.Please provide Police with details such as the approximate date(s) of the above mentioned phone calls, the approximate time(s) of the phone calls and any further information that you think will help Police in the search for information about the phone calls.


5. “Any information that any attempt whatsoever was made by police to obtain any evidence of Rachel Betteridge’s claims.”


So firstly, Police File number 010518/2481.  This is the file referred to in the letter from Sergeant Reid of the Masterton Police to lawyer Ainslie Hewton's office, of course if exists.  Every time the police are told to investigate it or respond to communication regarding the complaint, by the PCA, lawyers, etc, they say the complaint has been responded to in previous correspondence - what rubbish!  Now they are saying the file doesn't exist - what utter lies.  This is how your taxes are spent folks, paying liars like Tara Sewell and her corrupt mates in the Force.  They just make it up as they go along.

What's next?  Oh yes, the caravan, and "There is nothing in writing":

 

 

There's more interesting reading on this matter, watch this space.  Jonathon Hooker is an ex police officer who perfed out and set up his own church, Oasis, another Oasis church was recently exposed for fraud.  Jonathon Hooker and his church don't care less about Community Gardens, they care about getting funding for themselves.  Here he is bribing John Creepy Crawford with a couple of hundred bucks to shut up and stop complaining to the Police about me.

Alan Royal and John "Creepy" Crawford had no authority whatsoever to make a complaint to the police about the caravan!  They are lucky they haven't been charged with making false complaints and wasting police time! 

The matter of the requests for information are typical non responses, more on that soon, watch this post.

The matter of Rachel Betteridge is evidence of deeper and more malicious corruption involving conspiracy between Police, lawyers, Court staff, and Judge Davidson.  Check out other posts on the matter, such as the one at the link, more soon.  Open these images in Paint program if you have trouble viewing them.

 

Drugs, an interesting perspective:

Here's a letter to the editor of the local paper from Dr Richard McGrath, who gave evidence for the prosecution during the hearing of the five charges arising from the police acted like stormtroopers, actions described by a number of lawyers in scathing terms such as politically motivated bullying, police corruption, gross misfeasance and abuse of position, process, etc. Dr McGrath regularly attends the Masterton police station in his role as a local GP, he sees a lot of the effects of drug abuse first hand, and this is what he says:

The word "drugs" is abused as much as the drugs themselves are - bring in a reliable test of actual impairment, do some proper testing - prescription drugs, alcohol, even tobacco, all have an effect on behaviour, allowing cigarettes, party pills, herbal highs and alcohol to be sold in supermarkets and dairies while conducting this witch hunt on cannabis is the height of hypocrisy really. Alcohol and road deaths are indisputably linked, and the government refuses to implement the recommendations of medical staff and others to take action against the epidemic of alcohol abuse.

Watching tv the other night there was a ridiculous government funded ad with some actors driving around in a car and the actor playing the driver "acting" in his interpretation of a "druggie" (- it's like the "Commies" in the US in the 60's that everyone had to go to Vietnam to fight -) and the mumbled dramatic narrator asking "42% of people thought driving stoned was alright - do you?" - I want to see some intelligent and independent scientific data regarding testing the actual level of impairment. Following this ridiculous advertisement (- advertisement for what you might ask - for the government to implement drug testing beneficiaries, that's what) was an ad for Effexor XR, then one for Viagra, not long ago they were advertising Vioxx and others which have suddenly been pulled from the market - we are one of the few countries in the world where you can advertise drugs on TV like that!

Drug test public servants, police, politicians, etc FIRST. A drunk politician does a lot more damage in society than a beneficiary who might have had a puff as it was being passed round a week or two ago!

Then there's the 'Party Pills' pushed by lunatic Matt Bowden, and the utter hypocrisy of MP's like Peter Dunne.

Following the 'Better Work Stories' advertisement debacle and the hypocritical "Whose behaviour does your child reflect" waiting room posters, we now have to put up with the latest in police public relations exercises - they should just get on with policing.

And that's just the police - look at the state of our Courts!

We have bigger problems than people using cannabis! We have corrupt, politically motivated police, government officials and politicians!

Time for some proper debate on these matters.

McPhee's Mind in the Gutter As Usual - On Behalf of Your Council:

To the Chief Executive Officer
Carterton District Council:


20 September 2010


Dear Sir,  

FORMAL COMPLAINT:

This is a formal complaint regarding the abusive, spiteful and inaccurate comment published by the Mayor, on behalf of the Carterton District Council:

"Miss Raue, the community of Carterton has had a gutsful of your bullying and negativity and I think people should be made aware that your daughter has a protection order against you and you are one of
the saddest people I?ve ever come into contact with in my life. The amount of money and time you use within the legal system is truly a travesty of justice, please do your community a favor and leave you
sad, sick, ugly, evil, bitch.

Sincerely yours

Gary McPhee
Mayor, JP, and Marriage Celebrant.

P.S. if I can personally help you shift on behalf of your council and community please do not hesitate to contact me."

His pathetic abuse of the power he holds makes a mockery of justice and democracy in New Zealand, it's right down there with the spectacle Georgina Beyer made of "her"self at the public meeting to try and talk the community into the " Community Facility/Event Centre" which was so soundly rebuked by Judge Behrens QC - right before Beyer was forced to resign from Parliament in disgrace for lying about the Carterton Community Centre and the Carterton District Council members and associates, on official letterhead!  


My family, and my personal affairs, are nothing to do with McPhee, or the Council.  (My daughter has never
applied for a protection order against me, nor has she ever had any need to, she comes to visit me regularly.)  McPhee is bitter, twisted, nasty violent drunkard.

The comment brings the Council into disrepute and as such is a breach
of the Code of Conduct.

I expect an immediate apology.

--
Kate Raue
Transparency in New Zealand
Friends of Caring Communities
http://kate-raue.blogspot.com

To Ombudsmen, 9 September 2009:

Ombudsmen

I wish to complain about the administrative acts, decisions and recommendations of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.

I complained to that office about the corrupt and incompetent so called "investigation" into my complaint by Diane Swan of that office, and about the original complaint, which was:

1. The refusal of the South End School, Carterton, to provide me with information.  I requested all information about me after I received a letter sacking me from my job because I had allegedly been "recently charged by the police with an offence involving a child".
2. The refusal of the School to correct the false information:
3. The Principal of the School denied the existence of letters of complaint from parents regarding the manner in which I have been treated until confronted with the evidence.  I request an apology for this.
4. The Deputy Principal of the School confirmed that the matter was discussed at a Board of Trustees meeting, I requested the Minutes of the meeting at which it was decided by the Board to send me the letter, and 
5. the notes of the staff representative which were referred to by the Deputy Principal, confirming that the Board had discussed the false allegation, and the source of the allegation, the police and McPhee.
6. The refusal to correct the information - that there was a meeting with O'Leary and I regarding these matters prior to me receiving the letter from the Board.  There was no meeting between O'Leary and I regarding these matters until after I received the letter from the Board.
7. Principal Rod O'Leary has falsely claimed that I told him that I had recently been charged by the police with an offence involving a child, which is utter rubbish, as the Deputy Principal Dallas Powell knows, and it is an obvious lie to pretend otherwise.  I told him no such thing.  The allegation is obviously completely illogical and untrue, I hadn't been charged so there is no likelihood at all that I would say so.  Or that the Board would take such action on that basis anyway!
8. The refusal to correct the information contained in the letter to W and J Armstrong from the School, which falsely claims:
9. That "it was brought to the Board's attention that there could have been a problem with Kate Raue's actions out in the community and we sought only to make sure our children were safe and secure as is our responsibility."  This is an orchestrated litany of lies.
10. I requested all information regarding the above statement, including who brought it to the attention of the Board, when, specifically how - what exactly was the allegation?  
11. The refusal to correct the information regarding the false statement "there could have been a problem with Kate Raue's actions out in the community" - what problem?  What actions out in the community?  What relevance does any of that rubbish have to do with my actions at the School?  (None)
12. I request that the Board write immediately to the Armstrong family apologising for providing the false information - there were no valid concerns about any problem with my actions in the community - I represent a large proportion of this community who fully support me, and this is blatant, politically motivated corruption, by McPhee and his mates in the local police.
13. Corrupt local police and Mayor Gary McPhee deliberately provided false information to the Principal of the School and others in the community.  This fact is welll documented and witnessed, and indisputable.
14. This is also confirmed by the Mayoral Diary, and the evidence of the Deputy Principal, which the Privacy Commissioners Office arrogantly refuses to acknowledge or investigate or confirm.  The continued refusal to delberately ignore the evidence of crucial witnesses amounts to serious corruption.
15. The complaint has been "investigated" with extreme prejudice and bias by the Privacy Commissioner.  Clearly the decision of the Board of Trustees to write the letter sacking me for this very serious allegation would have been discussed and recorded in the minutes of a meeting of the Board, and as such the minutes must be provided as requested.
16. The notes of the staff representative have been deliberately destroyed after I requested them, which was immediately I was told by the Deputy Principal of their existence, which was immediately after she saw them, days after the meeting.  I formally requested them in writing from the Principal, along with the rest of the information immediately after that.  This is blatant corruption, to prevent the investigator finding out the truth of the matter.  I repeat my request that Dallas Powell be required to confirm what the notes said, and the truth of what I have written in regard to these matters and the untruth of what has apparently been told to the Privacy Commission's "investigator" 
17. Can I have access to all information regarding the "investigation" of the Privacy Commissioner's Office please?

Katherine Raue

Section 173A(2) of the Summary Proceedings Act:

At the hearing on 22nd September 2009 corrupt amicus curiae Bryan Yeoman tried to make me sign a document to the Court from the Police prosecutor, which claimed that:

"By consent of all parties of this hearing, written statements by:
Constable Laura Rhymer
shall be admitted as evidence as if these persons had given oral evidence and shall be admitted notwithstanding non-compliance of all of the requirements of Section 173A(2) of the Summary Proceedings Act 1957"
       - among other things.

I refused to sign it because it was a corrupt attempt to prevent the police officer in charge of the case (Rhymer) from giving evidence in person, or being cross examined.  She is lying in saying that she had cause to arrest me and in saying that she did arrest me.  She knew there was no evidence whatsoever that I had perverted the course of justice, and considerable evidence that her superior officer Constable Peter Cletus Cunningham had grossly perverted the course of justice in refusing to charge Murphy and Greig with the attack on me on 11th February 2009.  She knew that Cunningham had encouraged Murphy to break into my house and steal the disk containing evidence not only of his own attack on me, but also of the incompetence and corruption of the police in releasing the 46 audio tracks on the disk but not the two I requested, my own call to 111 and that of Claire Cook and Kelly Wilson.  Rhymer never arrested me.  She repeatedly asked me to go with her to Masterton because I was "going to be charged."  She knew there was no evidence to support any such charge and that it was grossly corrupt to arrest me or charge me, and she didn't want to be involved, which is why she didn't turn up to Court on the 8th December 2009, because police knew that Judge Behrens would see through their lies like he did last time, and are hoping to get a corrupt Judge (like Davidson or Thomas).

Furthermore, when I looked up Section 173A(2) of the Summary Proceedings Act, I discovered that it was repealed in 2008, and apparently replaced with this:

173 Persons who may give evidence under assumed name

• 
  

“(1) An undercover police officer (within the meaning of section 108 of the Evidence Act 2006)—

• 
  
  “(a) may make a written statement, or give oral evidence, in the name by which the officer was known during the relevant investigation; and

• 
  
  “(b) may sign that statement, or the record of that evidence, in that name.

“(2) A witness who is the subject of an application for an anonymity order made under section 110 or 112 of the Evidence Act 2006, or who is the subject of an anonymity order made under either of those sections,—

• 
  
  “(a) may make a written statement, or give oral evidence, using the term ‘witness’ followed by an initial or mark; and

• 
  
  “(b) may sign that statement, or the record of that evidence, in that manner.

“(3) This section overrides any contrary provision in this Part.

Here are my written instructions sent to the lawyer assigned to represent me, on 15 October 2009, following the outrageous outburst from Judge Davidson and my imprisonment after police deliberately lied to and intimidated a local family offering me a bail address:

"My instructions are that a copy be requested of the audio recording of the proceedings heard before Judge Davidson on 29^th and 30^th September and a formal complaint lodged about the actions and language of the Judge, in particular the shouted rant about how it's time I learned that the world doesn't revolve around me, the repeated shouting of “shut up, you shut up” and the imprisonment at Arohata.

Judge Davidson recently heard the matter of my private prosecution against Rachel Betteridge and he heard the original charge against me based on Betteridge's perjurous 'evidence'.

He excused Betteridge's appearance, which makes a mockery of my imprisonment.

He was told repeatedly during the hearing of the charges against me that Betteridge was giving perjurous evidence on oath during the hearing, and that we had evidence of it right there in the Court in the form of the phone with the extremely offensive and threatening messages from Betteridge on it. Davidson shut the hearing down, dismissing the charges before the evidence, or any evidence for the defence, could be produced. After being informed that perjury was being committed and that there was indisputable evidence of it in the Court I believe that Judge Davidson had a duty to respond to that serious allegation at the time, and again when he heard the private prosecution. I insist that the matter is addressed now.

I instruct that a formal complaint is made to the Manager for Courts regarding the practise of Liz Harpleton and Gary Wilson conspiring to pervert the course of justice. Having the prosecutor's live in lover acting as Court Registrar is completely unacceptable. Harpleton made a submission to two JP's while she was sitting on the bench assisting them in her role, on behalf of the police, asking for an ajournment, even though the matter had been set down for formal proof. Ken Daniels was present and left a message on my phone that day to say that he was appalled at what he had seen and heard in the Court.

I instruct that a written complaint is submitted to the PCA immediately regarding the decisions of the police to proceed with the prosecutions against me when they knew perfectly well that the evidence showed indisputably that I had not sent any offensive messages at all and that Betteridge and her husband had sent extremely serious threats and abuse to me, and the continued refusal of the police to charge them when the evidence clearly exists that they committed these serious crimes, and the police were happy to lay charges and proceed with a prosecution against me on the basis of no evidence at all, and police refused to even seek any information from the telecommunications company let alone look at the evidence provided to them in the form of the statements of the two Justices of the Peace, Ken English and George Groombridge..

I instruct that an appeal is lodged immediately regarding the refusal of Judge Davidson to award me costs in those matters.

I instruct that an appeal is lodged regarding the convictions for failing to stop, etc.

I instruct that an appeal is immediately lodged regarding Judge Davidson's decision to imprison me. The police deliberately lied to Bill Armstrong and told him that the Court had directed me to reside at 1 Brooklyn Rd and imposed a curfew which required the police to come to that address and check that I was there twice a night. Bill and Jennifer Armstrong have already written statements about being harassed by the police about me. Jennifer's statement about a recent incident describes how she felt frightened and intimidated after Constable Harvey Pope demanded entry to her home stating that he had the right to come in because he was in fresh pursuit of a criminal, to issue me with another bike helmet ticket and a letter about harrassing Tuakana Greig which is nothing but a pack of utter lies. Greig has physically attacked me on numerous occasions in front of numerous witnesses and come to my home and attacked me on two occasions. Bill would not have refused if the police had not lied about the curfew. Furthermore, Constable Cadwallader issued me with another bike helmet recently but refused to give me the disclosure I was entitled to regarding these matters. I would not come to the door to accept the ticket as he demanded, and Rachel Armstrong refused his demand to come inside to issue it to me personally so he gave it to her to pass on to me. Cadwallader then went to the Armstrong's, and other addresses of my friends, repeatedly, claiming to have disclosure to give me, but refused on every occasion to leave it there for me to collect.

I don't have a car and cannot get employment or accomodation because of the lies told by the police which are evidenced by the letter to the South End School, and suffering extreme financial hardship because of the excessive fines being deducted from my invalid benefit for not wearing a bike helmet in spite of the letters from my doctor. The bail bond refers to an “evidential address” - where is the definition of this? I don't even know what an evidential address is and doubt the term has any meaning or legal standing. I am forced to stay at various locations dependant on restrictions such as bad weather or darkness which make cycling unsafe. For these reasons I will not be dictated to as to where I sleep, it is an outrageous breach of my human rights.

I instruct that a letter be written to the Police Complaints Authority and to the South End School immediately about the letter I received, and the matter of my complaints of serious violence and child abuse against Tuakana Greig and her partner. Tuakana Greig limped into Court on the 30^th  

with a big cut on her face and a black eye, she'd come straight from the hospital which is why she was late

.

I instruct that a formal complaint is made to the Human Rights Commissioner regarding my imprisonment, which was based on the lies of the police. I require the audiotape of the hearing because I heard Judge Davidson clearly refuse the request of the prosecutor that a curfew be imposed, and I heard the Judge give reasons why not. The prosecutor heard it and the police deliberately lied to Bill Armstrong and I request that an affidavit from Mr Armstrong be prepared, and also an affidavit from John Shields, who witnessed an attack on me by Greig outside East Taratahi Building Supplies in Wong Place. John Shields knows that I was nowhere near her address at all and I had come to his workshop to speak with him and gone straight back to my car and was still speaking to him when Greig ran down the road and attacked me.

The Wairarapa police are conspiring to pervert the course of justice, not me. I instruct that a letter be immediately written to the Ombudsmen regarding the refusal of the police to provide all information regarding the attack on me by Michael Murphy and Tuakana Greig at my home on 11^th February 2009, particularly the audiotape of the call from Claire Cook and Kelly Wilson to emergency services. This request is directly relevant to the current charges, and to the serious risk of violent child abuse, and is extremely urgent. The audiotape of a call from another witness has been released three times and there is no valid reason not to release the tape I have requested. The transcript is not sufficient because of inaccuraies between the transcripts and audiotape of other related calls which have been released. I have all personal details, names, addresses, phone number, etc of Cook and Wilson so there is no reason to withhold them.

I gave these, and other verbal instructions at the Court on the 29^th and 30^th and I want them all to be carried out.

Katherine Raue"

Lawyers - Chris Wingate's perspective:

The legal profession works as a business not a profession

The legal profession works as a business not a profession. Too many lawyers and judges are quite simply, parasites on society. They have bound us in red tape destroying micro and macro economic structures. The damage is huge.

Collectively, and sadly, they are a self serving narcissistic group of businessman who protect and foster their cashflow industry planting seeds for new legislation that creates new business. They control outcomes because each additional hour is huge income and to them and peoples problems are too good to settle quick.

Although lawyers owe a fiduciary duty to their clients, they are in a conflict of breaching that duty of care by their self serving control to earn obscene income, versus the needs of the client. The justice system has been undermined by lawyers who are sadly scamming the public and causing us all grief.

In her review of lawyers, New Zealand's Dame Margaret found lawyers taking backhanders, charging illegal "top-up" fees and grouping together to defraud the legal aid system. She was horrified as she visited courthouses and found lawyers and defendants "abusing the system to the detriment of clients, the legal aid system, the courts and the taxpayer". And that she said was only a tip of the iceberg. "The longer I talked to people, the more I found," Dame Margaret said. "I think I could have gone on forever."

We urgently need legislation to stop lawyers and judges deciding the conduct of their own members. Conflicts of interest are too great to allow self regulation.

For years the legal system has rejected appeals for the law to blend in more closely with public policy considerations. They claim the system is the best we have got. After spending millions and millions on lawyers in Arklow vs Maclean, all I can say to that is crap!

But I don't hold my breath for legislative protection because lawyers control parliament and politicians are too busy with their own conflict of interest, permanently campaigning to keep their job. And what does that mean? - they ignore you.

The only answer I can see on the horizon is the public to understand government is established to serve us.We own it, so we need to set the rules that control those who protect their own. Fiduciary legislative law is the only answer. And together with the removal of crown and judicial immunity any attempts by politicians and lawyers/legal society to self serve would be dealt with before a jury.

And yes, that would mean final decisions would be subject to the scrutiny of a special jury. Because if not, we don't have democracy, we have a dictatorship. And none of us have signed up for that.

So next time you have to deal with some idiot in power just concider how his actions of failure would appear before a jury- the people's constitutional jury. Do you think they would get away with self serving negligent conduct?

http://lawisanass-wingate.blogspot.com

Lies (by the police), Lawyers and Legal Aid - September 2010 update

After being assaulted again last weekend by Constable Paul Dallinger, previously of Dannevirke, and his new mates including, corrupt Masterton police prosecutor Greg Peters, after I went to the Carterton Police station to report the theft of my property by local methamphetamine addict Rachel Taylor, and recent assaults by Rachel's mate Wayne Friend and his other low life mates, find out how to apply for a protection order, request assistance from the police to access and remove my belongings, etc, I now have to go to Court again today, after police wasted Court time on two days last week, after charging me yet again with trivial offences in a pathetic attempt to make me out to be a criminal.  Talk about pot calling the kettle black!  Running out of time to get to Masterton, here's the letter just sent to the Chief District Court Judge about these matters, more soon:

_________________________________________________________________

Police prosecutor Gary Wilson and Court Registry Officer Liz Harpleton have been perverting the course of justice in the Masterton District Court for years.  They conspired with others to issue a warrant for my arrest on the 16th February 2010 in the Masterton Court, on the basis of information that they knew was false, namely: that I had failed to appear in the District Court on that day.  I was not due to appear in Court that day.  

Charges of perverting the course of justice and escaping from custody were laid together by corrupt Community Constable Peter Cletus Cunningham in April 2009, both charges relating to the same matter, and both charges relating to an attack on me in my home by Michael Murphy, the witness in this case.  Cunningham has refused to charge Murphy with that attack (or anybody, for that matter), pretending it didn't happen.  

When I obtained indisputable evidence that it did happen, Murphy came back to my home to try and steal the evidence.  Police tried to prevent me getting this evidence, saying "According to the Privacy Act you are not entitled to information that is created by other people" - which is, of course, utter rubbish and completely untrue.

Corrupt Police officers and Court officials, amicus curiae Bryan Yeoman, have been trying to separate the two charges that were laid together ever since, because they think they have a better chance of success with winning one or both of the hearings if they can do this.

The other thing they've been trying to do is excuse the attendance of the police officer ostensibly in charge of the case, Constable Laura Rhymer, and ensure that she doesn't have to give evidence or be cross examined, and that her word that she arrested me is taken for granted by the Court without question.

Corrupt amicus curiae and crown prosecutor Michael Snape tried to make me sign an agreement that Constable Laura Rhymer not be called to give evidence in Court, and that her written statement be admitted unchallenged.  They are worried that she will be questioned about other matters as well as this one, such as why she has refused to take a complaint about Hayden Rose smashing a window at my home and making serious threats, in spite of numerous complaints from me and another woman present at the time, and other matters.  

Police are also responsible for engineering the bail address to the very same one that the police prosecutor opposed, as described in the email below, because of alleged concerns for my safety.  

Evidence shows that I tried to draw this to the attention of the Court on the 9th March 2010.  An email from Bryan Yeoman to Michael Snape (crown prosecutor) and Pearl Christian, Wellington District Court officer - but no copy was sent to me - records that "Ms Raue also ought a Variation of Bail to allow her to return to a "no fixed abode" setting.  Judge Barry was not willing to do this and told Ms Raue to file a proper written Variation of Bail Application, file and serve it on the Crown and then the Court would give it hearing time.  Ms Raue protested this decision and in the end Judge Barry stood up and said he would retire if the Accused would not leave the dock from where she was arguing the point.  She did so and left Courtroom.  

Outside Ms Raue abused me and made various demands and reiterated that she did not want Mr Sainsbury as her Counsel, and she did not want me as the Amicus Curiae either.

The end point is that there are the matters I raised in my letter of 12th February as pretrial issues to resolve - can you please advise what disclosure matters can be addressed without reference back to the Court and then perhaps we can determine what other issues should be set down for Pre Trial hearing (no time was allocated at all today as no proper written Applications had been made on her behalf to the Court).  

Is it appropriate to have both Counts in the one indictment ?

Please advise.

Thanks,

Bryan Yeoman.

_______________________________________________________________________________

This is why I requested all information from the Court!  I have never seen the letters referred to, notes of phone calls, etc, the Court refuses to listen to me when I try and tell them that their decision directly contradicts another recent decision on the matter and puts me in danger of violence as indeed has now happened.

Yeoman and the prosecutor were told off by Judge Behrens for continually trying to split up these charges!  Judge Behrens ordered that they be heard together on the 8th December, when the police didn't turn up for Court again.

I went to the Carterton Police station last weekend (4th or 5th September) to request protection and make complaints of assault and burglary/theft at the address and was assaulted by Constable Paul Dallinger at the Carterton and Masterton Police station, illegally detained again, and falsely charged with more trivial offences myself, for which I have to travel to Masterton again tomorrow to appear.  

The evidence of my complaints of burglary and assault, requests for assistance and protection have all been ignored.

Lawyer Ainslie Hewton acted corruptly while her firm was representing me, culminating in the hearing before Judge Behrens QC on the 8th December 2009.

Judge Behrens isn’t stupid, or corrupt.  The police know that, so they didn’t turn up on the 8th December, and they wasted the time of the Court as they have done countless times in the past few years.

Judge Behrens asked the prosecutor why the officer in charge of the case, Constable Laura Rhymer wasn’t there.  The prosecutor replied that she was on annual leave.  

Judge Behrens enquired further as to when this leave was applied for by Ms Rhymer, and was informed that she had applied for it about two working days before the Court hearing, knowing full well that her appearance was essential to the hearing.  

Judge Behrens expressed his extreme dissatisfaction with this inexcusable waste of Court time by the Police.

Judge Behrens asked if there was an up to date medical report on the effect of the ongoing proceedings on my health, and a lawyer from Ainslie Hewton’s firm referred the Judge to the very same psychiatric report that firm had been instructed to appeal and challenge on the ground of serious inaccuracy.  

The report contains  considerable false information.  From the first paragraph, which says that I am facing onecharge of attempting to pervert the course of justice - I am facing two charges which were laid together, the above and escaping from custody.

The second paragraph contains reference to photocopies of previous assessments of me by Mental Health Service in the Wairarapa.  I have requested these and they have not been provided, I question the accuracy of these ‘reports’ because of previous experience with these ‘Services’, and current complaints about them.

The third paragraph contains reference to the other selected people that the psychiatrist spoke to about me, on the recommendation of Alison Mulholland, Court Liaison Officer.  He spoke to Constable Peter Cunningham of the Carterton Police.  The history of corruption and malicious actions of Constable Cunningham towards me is well documented, and it is completely inappropriate that he speak with Cunningham.  The name of the usual police prosecutor, Gregory John Peters is crossed out the Summons, or Information, filed in Court, and the name Peter Cletus Cunningham is handwritten in it's place, because the usual Masterton prosecutors know how corrupt these charges are.  Cunningham was touted in the newspaper recently as a Community Constable, not a prosecutor.

Cunningham was the officer in charge of the corrupt ‘investigation’ into the attack on me in my home on 11th February 2009 by Michael Murphy, his crucial witness in this case currently before the court, his first attempt at a prosecution - he is a junior Community Constable, not a prosecutor of serious charges!  The matter is directly linked to the attack on me in my own home by Murphy and his associates, and even the other corrupt staff at the Masterton prosecution section won't touch this one, because they've lost too many times already and had to apologise, after listening to Cunningham and his mates. 

There is indisputable evidence of Cunningham’s corruption toward me over a number of years, this will be referred to later.

The psychiatrist also spoke with a previous counsel, Ken Daniels.  There is no note of who referred him to Mr Daniels, but again, this was gravely inappropriate.  Mr Daniels withdrew at short notice for the third or fourth time after refusing to accept specific, reasonable, logical, instructions to send a particular letter we had agreed should be sent to police, a standard letter requesting information I am lawfully entitled to, request specific information from the police, such as the recording of the call to emergency services from Claire Cook and Kelly Wilson, witnesses to Murphy's attack on me last February, etc.

The email below was sent on 16th March 2010, there has been no response, the information is urgently required:

I also require an Application for Variation of Bail, as previously requested.  Please email this to me so I can copy it or fill it in and email it back urgently.

I asked/instructed Mr Sainsbury and Ms Scott to do this numerous times, and asked Mr Yeoman to assist me with it also.  I asked Mr Sainsbury and Ms Scott to act regarding the illegal imprisonment and the warrant issued on the 16th February and to obtain all information.

TO BE CONTINUED.

____________________________________________________________________________

On 16 March 2010 07:17, Katherine Raue <kateraue@gmail.com> wrote:

Please pass this URGENT message on immediately to Frank Minehan of Ainslie Hewton immediately.  Please ring the office of that firm and request an email address for Frank Minehan and forward this message to it.

Please also forward it to the Masterton Court and the Area Commander of the Wairarapa Police and the Police Complaints Authority, it is a formal complaint and an URGENT information request.

I have been illegally imprisoned twice recently and have lodged a complaint with the Law Society about Ainslie Hewton, which is relevant to the illegal imprisonment and matters currently before the Court.

On the most recent occasion I was arrested on a warrant which was illegally obtained by conspiracy between Court staff and police, particularly adulterous de facto couple Liz Harpleton and Gary Wilson, on 22nd February 2010, which was based on information known by police and Court staff to be false, and my bail address was changed because of actions of the police and the amicus curiae, and I was bailed to an address previously opposed by the police to the extent that I was imprisoned.

TAKE NOTICE THAT I ABSOLUTELY REFUSE TO LIVE AT HODDERS ROAD AND WILL CONTINUE TO LIVE AT NO FIXED ABODE REGARDLESS OF THE BAIL BOND ISSUED AFTER MY ILLEGAL IMPRISONMENT ON 22ND AND 23RD FEBRUARY, THE ACTIONS OF THE POLICE AND THE COURT ARE CORRUPT.  THIS IS A FORMAL COMPLAINT ABOUT  THE ACTIONS OF THE POLICE AND THE COURT REGARDING THE ILLEGAL WARRANT, THE ILLEGAL ARREST, THE ILLEGAL IMPRISONMENT, AND THE IMPOSITION OF THE BAIL ADDRESS IN HODDERS ROAD AFTER THE POLICE REFUSED TO AGREE TO IT BECAUSE OF CONCERNS OF VIOLENCE VERY RECENTLY.

1. I request immediate confirmation in the form of a statement from lawyer Frank Minehan and one from the manager of the Court to confirm that when I was brought before the Court on 23rd September 2009 (or at a recent hearing at which Mr Minehan represented me) I was bailed to the address: "NO FIXED ABODE"
2. I request that Ainslie Hewton and the manager of the Courtimmediately forward me a copy of the bail bond stating that I am living at "NO FIXED ABODE" and typed copies of any notes made by Frank Minehan regarding the hearings on 22nd and 23rd September (I have received some documents from Ainslie Hewton but cannot read many because of illegible handwriting and faint photocopying, there are also missing pages, and no information regarding the bail bond or the hearing at which the police opposed the Hodders Road address.
3. I request immediate confirmation in the form of a statement from Frank Minehan to confirm that when I was brought before the Court on 23rd September 2009 it was revealed that the police had deliberately lied to the Xxx family in telling them that there was every likelihood of a curfew being imposed when the Judge had clearly and firmly refused the application hours earlier and made it clear that there was NO such possibility.  This is the lie that led to my imprisonment.
4. I request immediate confirmation in the form of a statement from Frank Minehan, and one from the police prosecution section, to confirm that when I was brought before the Court on 23rd September 2009 the police successfully opposed me being bailed to an address in Hodders Road because of concerns about "previous violence at that address", which is why I was finally bailed to no fixed abode.
5. I request immediate confirmation in the form of a statement from the Police that the occupant of the address at Hodders Road went to the Carterton police station and complained about disharmony at his address resulting from the letter to me from the Board of the South End School.
6. I request from the police all information about this incident involving the occupant of the address going to the police station about me, including a statement he says was taken regarding the matter.
7. All this information has been requested before and the request is now urgent.

--
Katherine Raue