Confirmation of ongoing corrupt prejudice and bias by Wairarapa police.

This letter from a lawyer dated 25 July 2007, says (p2, para2) "It was always apparent from an early stage that for whatever reason you were a 'lightning rod' for police attention in Carterton.  This was, in my view, most unfair to you, and unwarranted police attention resulted in unnecessary charges being laid."  I do not agree with all the statements in this letter, but I certainly agree with that one.

I shoplifted once about 30 years ago after I listened to a friend who said it would be a good idea, and stole a pot plant from someone's verandah at about the same time.  I learned my lesson and didn't break the law again for 30 years.  And then I ended up in Carterton, where the corrupt local police get their kicks tormenting law abiding people while they let criminals get away with blatant crimes such as the drunken home invasion committed by recidivist violent offender Gary Hamilton McPhee (half way down the page at that link).  I discovered how the media corruptly portray decent people as criminals while they promote their favorite political candidates for personal gain.

McPhee boasted about his despicable attack in the pathetic little police propaganda publication the local Wairarapa Times-Age, under the headline "Exclusive: WHY I DID WHAT I DID" which lauded him as a hero and promoted the lie that the victims had "asked for it", describing them as "criminals and troublemakers" - exactly the same way PC Cunningham tried to make out that I had "asked for it" regarding the attack by Michael Murphy on 11 February 2009, which McPhee helped plan, and which resulted in the equally despicable letter from the Board of Trustees of the South End School, not to mention the current corruptly laid charge of perverting the course of justice.

After I was punched in the face by the chairman of the committee of the Carterton Community Centre (which mainly consisted of members of the Carterton District Council, I couldn't believe that the police insisted on letting him off with diversion in spite of the fact that it was the second time he'd assaulted me in a week.

Wairarapa Police have corruptly conspired with Masterton Court staff to pervert the course of justice repeatedly for many years now and it is time for a full and transparent inquiry.  Systemic failures in the Wairarapa Police have been well documented for years - the website of the Masterton Library has a link to Newspaper searches.  Search 'Wairarapa Police' (sort set to latest to earliest, try Masterton police or just police) and you will see that systemic failures have been reported regularly since the library began keeping records.  (Other interesting keywords to search this database are Crime, Suicide, Georgina Beyer, Gary McPhee, etc.)  I'm not perverting the course of justice, the police are, and have been for years, assisted by Police Prosecutor Gary Wilson's de facto partner, Deputy Registrar of the Masterton Court Liz Harpleton, and their corrupt mates.

Here's a link to part one of a report by the IPCA into systemic failures within the NZ police with particular regard to uninvestigated child abuse allegations, and the manner such investigations are carried out in general.

After coming to Carterton I was elected to the committee of the Carterton Community Centre as Secretary and Finance Officer by the members of the incorporated society and asked to investigate allegations of fraud and mismanagement which were obviously well founded, and are supported by letters from several lawyers and the evidence itself, such as the financial reports, Minutes book, etc.  I discovered a number of large number of payments being made to individuals and recorded as personal grievance payments, or miscellaneous, although the payments were purely arbitrary and the matters were not subject to Employment Tribunal judgements or any other legal process, and in fact, had been made against specific legal advice.

This is the transcript of a letter from Masterton lawyer Ivan Young-Gough to fellow lawyer Ainslie Hewton regarding these matters:  Ainslie Hewton had agreed to represent me in an claim to the Employment Tribunal of unjustified dismissal, etc, and Ivan Young Gough offered his assistance accordingly, after confirming to me that he had specifically advised the committee of the Carterton Community Centre, including current Deputy Mayor Elaine Brazendale and several Carterton District Councillors, not to make the payments, which was the reason for the Bill of Costs referred to in the last paragraph:

FROM IVAN YOUNG GOUGH TO AINSLIE HEWTON  28 MAY 2001


Dear Kamil,


As discussed with Kate and yourself I said I would get back to you with my view of the issues arising from her relationship with the Carterton Community Centre (CCC).


I note that Kate already has a personal grievance underway with Gawith & Co, arising from a previous employment relationship.  I do not believe it would be helpful for her cases by having three lawyers working for her.  I also hold the view that the personal grievance arising from her employment at the CCC is too closely associated with the other issues that arise and that the wisest course is to confine the matters to one lawyer.  


The issues as I see them are as follows:

• personal grievance for unjustifiable disadvantage before her dismissal (or lock out);
• personal grievance for unjustifiable dismissal (good arguments on substantive and procedural grounds;
• arising from the above there seems to be holiday pay owing (I am not sure what notice provisions there were, if any;
• a second complaint to the Police arising from an alleged assault the day before the one that went to Court;
• A complaint to the Police concerning the granting of diversion for an assault causing actual bodily harm (broken teeth) and the manner in which that outcome was arrived at by the Police;
• A claim for ACC cover and entitlements;
• A civil claim for restitution/reparation for the costs of treatment and associated matters arising from both assaults;
• Civil action against the person who assaulted Kate if this is possible; and civil action against the CCC and the individual members if they nave acted ultra vires (which seems to be the case)

From past experience I doubt if the CCC itself has much in the way of assets.  I doubt whether most of the individuals concerned have much either.


I would be happy to assist, advise or provide whatever I can to progress Kate’s claims.  I believe there needs to be a pragmatic approach, and that any proceedings unlikely to succeed or achieve much for the effort expended should be ditched.  The rest needs to be prioritised and set down in some sort of plan/strategy.


Finally, Kate has asked me about a Notice of Costs the CCC paid to me sometime last year.  As she is no longer employed in the position she held I cannot assist.  This could possibly be obtained by disclosure.


Give me a call if you want any help; leave a message if I am out or unavailable.


Yours sincerely,


Ivan S. Young-Gough, lawyer

_____________________________________________________________________________

Mark Wahlberg Slams McPhee in Style:

Mark Wahlberg often writes witty letters to the editor, that deserve to be better read.  Click on this link for another letter by Mark Wahlberg, "Crime, public have a right to know", about the policy of the local police and their mate McPhee to make up their own crime statistics.  Also at that link, check out the first two articles, documenting other examples of McPhee's violence.

"Ron Mark's Offers Just Don't Stack Up" - it's Official:

- 2 November 2010, Wairarapa Times-Age

The cheek of Ron Mark.  He whines that there's been a distinct lack of investment in Carterton, and also notes that the previous Council, under drunken lunatic Gary McPhee, was also turned down, although the Events Centre is already under construction.  There has been huge opposition to the Centre, two substantial community petitions (if not three).

Funders will not invest in this project, and well informed funders have refused to do so since 2002, when the former Carterton Community Centre was taken over illegally by a group of people who are mainly associated with the Carterton District Council, a major funder of the Centre.

Trust House CEO Bernard Teahan says that the Carterton District Council has never made any credible applications for funds: "We have certainly had no suggestions by the (Carterton District) council.  Mr Teahan says that while the Trust will always look at opportunities, there had been several businesses offered to them over the years, but none of them had stacked up, including Mayor McPhee's pub, the Buckhorn.

The so called Event centre doesn't stack up because the same group of people behind the proposal are the ones responsible for the illegal takeover and closure of the former Carterton Community Centre.  The ringleaders of this definitely not bloodless coup were the recently appointed (by Mr Mark, I think) Deputy Mayor Elaine Brazendale, Councillors Jill Greathead, Ruth Carter, and Council librarian Ewen Hyde, among others associated with the Carterton District Council.

Mr Mark is pretending not to know about any of this.  Of course he's well practised in public deception and manipulation of the media for his own political and personal gain, having fawned at the feet of well known oily, greasy, two faced preening peacock, disgraced former MP Winston Peters.  He's learned how to pose and smile and make pathetic little noises like "I am conducting a rates review", etc, while ignoring the real issues, sweeping them under the carpet, greasing the palms of the local corrupt police officers in order to shut up any opposing view and shut down the dissemination of information, regarding the "Carterton Events Centre", which has been the subject of at least two substantial community petitions against the plan to build it and calling for an inquiry into the involvement of a number of people associated with the Carterton District Council and the Carterton Community Centre and conflicts of interest, fraud, bullying, etc.

These people, Elaine Brazendale, Ruth Carter, Ewen Hyde, Jill Greathead, Julie Hallam, Gary McPhee, Georgina Beyer, and others, took over the Carterton Community Centre illegally, by punching the Secretary and Finance Officer in the face in a vicious assault and then changing the locks.

They then made a formal complaint to police through local law firm Wollerman Cooke and McClure.

This complaint was soundly rejected and dismissed by Senior Sergeant Geoff Reid of the Wairarapa police.  It appears that Snr Sgt Reid was bullied into retiring from the police in disgust at the corruption which is so rife  within the Wairarapa police, shortly after writing the letter advising of this decision.

Police refuse to this day to investigate the allegations of serious misfeasance of people still on Ron Mark's Council, but it's nice to see Mr Teahan isn't fooled by the big smile, and nor is anyone else with even half a functioning brain.

Also of interest is the fact that local propaganda specialist Tanya Katterns has been sacked by the Dominion Post "news" paper for plagiarism, regarding a sickeningly sycophantic "report" she wrote about failed New Zealand First MP Ron Mark, the latest incompetent and corrupt Mayor to be foisted on the poor people of Carterton by corrupt election systems, having suffered through the misguided, destructive madness of unemployed, disgraced, transvestite prostitute Georgina Beyer, Gary McPhee, etc, and now we have to put up with this smarmy grinning gnome.

Noel Sainsbury, legal aid lawyer, refuses Defendants request for Court file:

I had to apply for legal aid regarding the current corruptly laid charges against me and was recently assigned lawyer Noel Sainsbury.  I received the following letter from him in April 2010, following the illegal imprisonment in February, which resulted from the corrupt Masterton Court blatantly refusing to follow the directions given by Judge Behrens on 8th December 2009 regarding the two separate indictments for the counts of Escaping from Custody and perverting the Course of Justice, which Judge Behrens ordered be combined in the one count.  Police and corrupt Court staff were trying to separate the Counts because they believed they had a better chance of perverting the course of justice by doing so.

Legal aid initially assigned lawyer Ken Daniels, who was instructed immediately to write to police and obtain a copy of the audio recording of the call to 111 regarding the attack on me on 11th February by the Crown witness in this matter Michael Murphy.  Murphy came to my home and attacked me on that date and Police have corruptly tried to make out that I am the offender instead of the victim of a serious attack.

I was illegally imprisoned on 22nd and 23rd February 2010 because of a warrant issued illegally in the Masterton Court as a result of a corrupt conspiracy between Court Registry officer Liz Harlpeton and her boyfriend Police Prosecutor Gary Wilson, and false information given to me by amicus curiae Bryan Yeoman.  I was also robbed of over $100 while at the prison, which has still not been returned to me.  I'd earlier received a letter from Amicus Curiae confirming that Legal Services had refused me another lawyer after the first one, Ken Daniels had refused to obtain the recording of Murphy attacking me, or even send his standard information request to Police regarding the current case.

Suddenly, after I requested the court file to find out who was responsible for the illegal imprisonment and theft, I was informed that Legal Services had changed their mind and Sainsbury was appointed.  He didn't show up at Court, and sent a representative, Miss Lucy Scott.  I told Miss Scott that I had been illegally imprisoned and robbed at the prison and that I needed my money returned immediately, she laughed and said I obviously didn't understand what it was that the firm had been assigned to do.  I said to her that I wanted access to the Court file, she said that wouldn't be allowed.  I said that I wanted my money back from the prison, she said I'd have to go to the prison and sort it out myself.  I told her that I have a bicycle and live in Carterton and had no money to even get home.  She laughed and said it wasn't her problem, so did the corrupt amicus curiae who was also involved in the discussion and was responsible for the theft and imprisonment in the first place.  I instructed Miss Lucy Scott to request the audio recording of the phone call to Police (through 111 emergency services) which was made by the two women who intervened in the attack with their dog, and to pass on that instruction to Noel Sainsbury.  That call is evidence that the Police are Perverting the Course of Justice, NOT me!

The New Zealand Courts are a big corrupt trough where greedy lawyers and amicus curiae feed, they don't operate in the interests of justice, they operate to line the pockets of the Court staff and lawyers who work there.  NZ has the highest rates of suicide in the world because we have such a high level of corruption.  I've never received a copy of the Court file, or the money that was stolen from me during the false imprisonment.

Police Act:

Check out number 6, read it carefully:

Larry Manson's failed $25,000 concert:

Local newspapers ran full page ads recently for the "Quake Rattle and Roll" concert to raise money for the Christchurch quake victims.  The concert was held in the Masterton Town Hall.  Manson's been getting funding for years from the Masterton District Council for his little schemes, and they are all abject failures, as this one was.

I'm reliably informed that Manson received $25,000 funding to organise the concert, and am awaiting confirmation of this.

Less than 50 people came through the door all day.  The bands were all Manson's friends, the catering was done by Manson's wife, Catie Lou Manson, and she pocketed her share of the loot for doing so.

The concert was a sad little failure.  Nobody likes Larry Manson and everyone is sick of him and his little schemes to line his pockets, which is why nobody went.

Manson has 68 recent convictions for dishonesty.  The Court evidence of this will be posted shortly.

Shame on Emily Brown and Rod O'Leary - corrupt LIARS:

Over a year ago Police went to South End School and told the Board of Trustees that they had charged me with child abuse, regarding the lies cooked up by Tracy Feast of 14 Wyndham St Carterton, and Michael Francis Murphy of 18 Wyndham St Carterton, the gutless wonder who came to my home and attacked me, and lied to a local woman so that she would attack me too.  This attack was a result of the local police policy of 'sharing information with community organisations'.

The problem is that these organisations are staffed by corrupt and uneducated people with and common sense or professional qualifications.  The most outrageous of the statements in Diane Swan's correspondence (below) is highlighted in yellow, it alleges that I told the school I'd been charged by police with "an offence involving a child".  What utterly corrupt lies!  This is exactly why Wairarapa has the highest rates of suicide in the world - just look at the blatant arrogance and corruption!

Click on the link and read the letter from the Board of Trustees, you'll see that it makes no mention of any meeting, as Swan alleges it does.  That's because there was no meeting with O'Leary and I prior to me receiving the letter from the Board sacking me, the only meeting was between corrupt police and O'Leary.

I asked local South End School Board of Trustees member Emily Brown, who recently left her husband to shack up with George Smith, to please pass on my request to meet with the Board to discuss these matters, as the continuing situation was causing me great harm.

Emily Brown had the cheek to turn up at the home of a friend of mine who had written one of the letters of complaint to the school referred to in the correspondence below (which the school tried to deny it had received until confronted with the evidence in the form of one of the letters), and in front of my friend Emily Brown said that she was concerned about my mental state and had contacted Police and mental health services.

Emily Brown's mother and brother committed suicide, and I can certainly see why now - what a bitch!  I use that word because the school secretary was recently found to have called a young female student, aged about 9 or 10, a "lying bitch", she said to the girl, in front of witnesses "You're a lying little bitch."

Emily Brown knows perfectly well that I haven't ever been charged with an offence involving a child, and that a meeting with the Board is the least I am entitled to.  She knows perfectly well there was no need to contact police or mental health, she is a manipulative liar!  She had no right to come to my friends home and slander me in front of my friend with her manipulative lies and her false, hypocritical "concern"!  People like Emily Brown shouldn't be on Boards of Trustees, she is an adulterous liar.  Emily Brown needs a psychiatric report far more than I do!  The Board of Trustees needs investigating.  Here is the correspondence:

18 February 2010

Dear Ms Raue I refer to our phone conversation on 9 February 2010, a message you left on our 0800 number on the same day, and your email of 10 February 2010 in which you provided a copy of your request for information to the South End School. Thank you for providing this information. Under principle 6 of the Privacy Act you are entitled to request, and have access to, personal information held by an agency. This right is not absolute and an agency can withhold information under sections 27-29 of the Privacy Act. I should also point out that 'personal information' under the Privacy Act is defined as information about an identifiable individual. So long as you are identified by the information, or it relates to you, then this is covered by the Act. You requested information about the garden at South End School. Unless this information identifies you in some way, it will not be your personal information so you will not be entitled to this information under thePrivacy Act. I have contacted the School about your requests for information and have also asked it about information it appears to have received from the Police about you. I will be in further contact as soon as I receive the School's response.  Regards

25th March 2010
Dear Ms Raue
I refer to previous correspondence concerning your complaint that the South End School has not provided you with personal information as requested. I have now had a response from the School. It advises that the only personal information it holds about you comprises emails you have sent; a supporting letter the principal Rod O'Leary wrote on your behalf on 9 November 2006; a letter from the Board of Trustees dated 25 March 2009 explaining its concern over an incident; and a copy of an incident report sent to Carterton Police on 5 February 2010. As you sent the emails to the School you will have copies already. You also have a copy of the Board of Trustees letter as you have provided us with a copy. The School says that you also have a copy of the supporting letter and received a copy of its complaint (or incident report) to the Police during the court process. As such, it does not have to provide this information to you again. If you have not received this information please let me know. As I have told you previously, you are not entitled to information about the school garden under the Privacy Act as this is not 'personal information' for the purposes of the Act. The School has also told me that it did not collect any information about you from the Police.  I understand you had a meeting with Mr O'Leary at which you told him about being charged by the Police, and which is also referred to in the Board of Trustees letter. As you disclosed this information to the School, and it did not collect any further information gathered from Police, there is no privacy issue for us to investigate. You are welcome to provide your comments which I would appreciate receiving by 9 April.  Regards
Diane Swan
Office of the Privacy Commissioner
_______________________________________________________________________

31st March 2010 - 14:38
Dear Ms Raue
I refer to your email below and one sent on 30 March. I will contact the school about the complaints or letters from parents you refer to. In terms of the meeting which you allege did not take place, I refer you to an email you sent to the school on 3 September 2009 in which you said: "I met with the principal Rod O'Leary, and told him that the allegation that I had been charged with any offence involving a child was untrue". Your comment that there was no such meeting is either incorrect or you have forgotten that meeting took place. It also appears that you did disclose information to Mr O'Leary during this meeting. If you require information urgently for a court hearing, you should be using the court discovery process. Under court rules each party to a proceeding is required to discover the existence of documents to every other party. This is done using a discovery order. If this information is required for a court hearing, you should ask your lawyer, or the court, about getting a discovery order. We cannot help you in this regard. I will be in further contact in due course.
Regards Dawn Swan | Team Leader, Investigations (Wellington) | Office of the Privacy Commissioner

31st March 2010 - 12:13
The school is deliberately withholding information, and the principal is lying if he caused you to "understand" any such thing.There have been a number of written and verbal complaints from parents who support me regarding the actions of the staff and letter from the BoT regarding me, and the request for copies of these complaints is well overdue.Where are the dated notes of this alleged meeting at which the principal alleges I told him this rubbish?  This claim is an outright lie and O'Leary knows it, so does the deputy principal, who came to my home and told me that I would be getting the letter because of discussions at a Board meeting which were recorded in the staff representatives notes of the meeting, which is how the DP found out about it.I request those notes also, immediately, and sworn statements from the DP and the staff rep.The information is urgently required to prepare for Court hearings.
Katherine Raue

4th April 2010 - 10:14
FORMAL COMPLAINT TO THE OMBUDSMEN ABOUT CORRUPTION IN PRIVACY OFFICE INVESTIGATION
O'Leary is lying deliberately, and you are deliberately misinterpreting the facts.The only meeting was AFTER the Deputy Principal XXXXX came and told me that McPhee and the police had told O'Leary and Kennedy that I'd been charged, I told the DP and O'Leary I HADN"T, in response to the false allegation in the letter, and any meeting occurred AFTER I received the letter.
FOR THE SAFETY OF THE CHILDREN AT THE SCHOOL A COMMISSIONER MUST BE APPOINTED IMMEDITATELY - O'LEARY AND KENNEDY ARE LYING DELIBERATELY.
O'Leary is deliberately lying in trying to make out that I ever told him I had been charged.


4th April 2010 - 10:22
URGENT:Whether or not I may be able to access information through the Court discovery process, I am entitled to the information under the Privacy Act and expect to receive it immediately, IN PARTICULAR ALL THE LETTERS FROM PARENTS TO THE SCHOOL IN PROTEST ABOUT THE ACTIONS OF KENNEDY, POWELL. O’LEARY AND 'WHAIA MICHELLE'.
The refusal of the school to acknowledge the many complaints from parents who support the work I did is an attempt to pervert the course of justice, it is corrupt deceit, the attempt by Diane Swan to manipulate the facts is pitiful, and I request that she is immediately relieved of further involvement in this "investigation" immediately and the Ombudsmen commence a proper investigation immediately.I made a serious allegation of child abuse and it has proven to be well founded and still not investigated, this matter is urgent.  There was no meeting until AFTER I received the letter containing the allegation, Diane Swan, Kennedy, O'Leary, XXXXX, all know that perfectly well and are attempting to pervert the course of justice.
Kate Raue


8 May 2010 14:12
Diane Swan:
I have told you repeatedly that the meeting was AFTER I received the letter, and all the evidence makes this perfectly clear.
I don't have copies of the emails you refer to, because they were sent from another computer, and have been deleted from that computer without being saved.  Please provide ALL INFORMATION, as requested, including these emails, particularly the one which you refer to in your email, dated 3rd September 2009, IMMEDIATELY.  Please print all the emails out and post to 1 Brooklyn Road Carterton.
I have told you repeatedly the details of the matter in chronological order:
I received a visit from the DP Dallas Powell informing me of the notes of the Board meeting and her discussion with the staff representative who attended the meeting.
I told Dallas Powell the allegation was untrue and requested a meeting with the Board and staff.
Then I received the letter from the Board.
AFTER receiving the letter from the Board I went to the school and met with O'Leary and told him that the allegation was untrue.
He told me that he had been told by the Police and Mayor McPhee about the allegation.
I consider that your email is an attempt to pervert the course of justice, you now perfectly well that the only meeting was AFTER I received the letter
I repeat my request that a detailed statement be taken from the former Deputy Principal of the South End School, Dallas Powell , from whom I requested a copy of the notes of staff representative when Powell told me that she had seen them, regarding this matter, confirming that:
Dallas Powell met with me prior to me receiving the letter.
Dallas Powell told me at this meeting that she had seen the notes made by the staff rep of the BoT meeting at which the allegation had been discussed.
I requested a copy of the notes.
I told her the allegation was not true, and told her that I hoped I would not receive such a letter.
I received the letter.
I then requested a meeting with O'Leary and at that meeting told him that the allegation was untrue, as I had previously told  the DP .
Provide the emails and the letters from the parents immediately, and stop lying about the meeting taking place prior to me receiving the letter - you know perfectly well it didn't!

Katherine Raue

14 May 2010 11:27
To The Privacy Commissioner, Ombudsmen and Diane Swan's supervisor/manager:
Formal Complaint:
Regarding the orchestrated litany of lies regarding my complaints about the South End School.
I insist that you copy the numbered, chronological account of events listed in my email to your office, which refers to the conversation with the deputy principal after xxx initiated communication about the matter by telling me about the staff representative's notes, and Dallas Powell conversation with the staff representative to the BoT, and the principal, and ask Dallas Powell to confirm or deny each numbered point -immediately - this matter involves the safety of children and it is completely unacceptable that Diane Swan is deliberately lying, and deliberately delaying and hindering this investigation - she should have sought this information from Powell when she was first asked to do so A YEAR AGO.  Swan knows perfecty well that O'Leary is deliberately lying,

O'Leary is lying about any meeting with me prior to the writing of the letter, and by concealing the many written complaints from parents about the way he and the Board have treated me, and denying the existence of these complaints and the staff reps notes of the meeting at which it was decided to write the letter - provide this information WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY.
Kate Raue
Friends of the Carterton Community Centre
Transparency in New Zealand

Further to my previous email -  The Deputy Principal’s email is: "[withheld for privacy reasons - but not for long!]" hurry up and obtain a written response from Dallas Powell to my account of events.
Katherine Raue